Plum IV
PLMK · Nasdaq
NO ACTION REQUIRED
There is no dated way to act
The last election on file was 10 July and nothing dated has been filed since, so we cannot show you a day to act by. That is an absence in our record, not a right that is gone.
Outer bound: the outside date, 16 January 2027 — a long-stop nobody can claim cash on.
Last close
1.1% below cash vs estimated NAV
Daily close · 9 Sept 2026
SpacBrain’s read
Floor not confirmed
The last redemption window closed with the 10 July election — it was held, and no new one has been filed since, so we cannot show you a date to act by.
What we do have: the deadline we compute for it runs to 16 January 2027 — our arithmetic off the IPO date and the charter term, not a date any filing we hold states. That deadline is not itself a window you can redeem into. The full chain of evidence is under Evidence.
Change on the last daily close0.0% day
That is $0.04 below the $10.69 of cash held per share as last filed — though the right to claim that cash is not confirmed on file. Against our ESTIMATE of what the trust holds today — ~$10.77, the filed figure carried forward at the T-bill — the same price is 1.1% below the cash. That estimate is our arithmetic, not a filing.
In plain terms
- What it is
- A $172.5M SPAC from Plum IV (Handwerker Steven), listed on Nasdaq in January 2025. Each unit put $10.10 into the shareholders' cash account at listing; it holds $10.69 a share today — interest earned on the account, plus any payments the sponsor made to extend the deadline, spread over the shares that never cashed out.
- What it's doing now
- It agreed in March 2026 to merge with Controlled Thermal Resources, a geothermal power and lithium extraction company based in the United States. The deal values that business at about $3.15B. No date has been filed for the shareholder vote.
- What you should know
- About 78% of the shares sold at listing have already been cashed in, leaving 3.7M and $184.4M of cash. We have no filed date on which you could claim the cash back, so we cannot tell you a day to act by. That is a gap in the public record, not a statement that the right has gone.
At a glance
- Where it stands
- Deal announced · next: the shareholder vote, awaiting filing
- A deal has been announced. Before anyone can redeem, a merger proxy has to be filed — an S-4 or F-4 registration statement, or a preliminary proxy — the SEC has to clear it, and a meeting date has to be set. That meeting is where you redeem. No such date is on file with us, so there is none to show.
- Merging with
- Controlled Thermal Resources (United States) — Develops and operates integrated geothermal power and critical minerals extraction facilities, primarily through its flagship Hell’s Kitchen Project at the Salton Sea in Imperial County, California.
- Pre-revenue: the filings show no meaningful actual revenue for the most recent reported period.
- Industry
- Energy — geothermal power and lithium extraction
- Deal value
- $3.1B
- announced 8 March 2026
- Price vs cash floor
- $10.65 vs $10.69
- $0.04 below the last filed cash held for you; 1.1% below cash against our estimated ~$10.77
- Cash left in trust
- $184.4M
- across 3,709,616 public shares
- IPO
- 15 January 2025
- $173M raised · 101.0% of each $10 unit into trust
- Headquarters
- 2021 FILLMORE ST. #2089, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94115
- registered in the Cayman Islands
- Lead underwriter
- Cohen & Company Capital Markets
- Key officers
- Steven Handwerker (Chief Financial Officer and Director) · Aghamiri Aidin (Director) · Roy Kanishka (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)
- Listed securities
- PLMK common · PLMKU unit $10.74 · PLMK common $10.59
As last filed, 30 June 2026.
source: 10-Q acc 0001213900-26-090092
Modelled, not filed: $10.69 filed 30 June 2026, compounded 72 days at the 3.95% 3-month T-bill (treasury.gov daily par yield curve). No tax drag, extension deposits or dissolution costs are modelled.
- vs last filed NAV
- 0.4%below cash
- $10.69, 10-Q as of Jun 30, 2026, acc 0001213900-26-090092
- vs estimated NAV today (our estimate)
- 1.1%below cash
- ~$10.77, accrued 72 days at 3.95%
Two denominators, one price. The filed figure is what a document says the trust held on its date; the estimate carries it forward at the T-bill for the days since, which is our arithmetic and not a filing.
A deal has been announced. Before anyone can redeem, a merger proxy has to be filed — an S-4 or F-4 registration statement, or a preliminary proxy — the SEC has to clear it, and a meeting date has to be set. That meeting is where you redeem. No such date is on file with us, so there is none to show. The outside date we hold is 16 January 2027 — a contractual long-stop, not a date you can claim cash on. What an outside date is →
Yield to redemption
No dated redemption window on file — no yield to compute.
We hold no redemption election for this SPAC. The only dated event on file is the outside date on Jan 16, 2027, which pays a holder nothing — so no yield can be measured to it. An unsourced date would make the yield look filed when it is not.
What is protecting this price
The reasoning behind the verdict above, in the order the filings establish it.
- The last redemption election on file — extension vote on 10 July — has passed, and no new one has been filed since. Holders who stayed through it keep the right to redeem at the next election; there simply is no next election on file, so this page cannot tell you a day to act by.
- Cash held in trust is $10.69 per share as last filed. That is the figure a redemption pays out at, plus whatever interest the trust earns between the filing and the window.
- The charter runs to a date no filing we hold states; from the IPO date and the charter term we estimate 16 January 2027. Whenever it falls, if no deal closes by then the trust is returned to holders — a floor of a different kind: it pays out, but you do not choose when, and this one you should read out of the prospectus yourself.
What has happened, and what is coming
6 dated milestonesEvery dated step from the day it listed to the next date you may have to act on. Where you have to do something, the day your broker needs the instruction is marked too.
78.5% of the public float took the cash
Show the earlier 2 milestones
- 15 January 2025IPOpassed
$173M raised into trust
- 8 March 2026Deal announcedpassed
Combination with Controlled Thermal Resources
Presentations
archived in fullEvery investor deck this SPAC has filed, kept slide by slide, with the SEC original beside it.
The deal
terms as filedWhat it is buying, on what terms, and how much of the combined company new shares take from you.
- Controlled Thermal Resources$3.1B · announced 8 March 2026announcedEnergypost-close CTRHWeb research
What Controlled Thermal Resources does — read from cthermal.com on 14 August 2026
Controlled Thermal Resources is developing the Hell's Kitchen project in California's Imperial Valley to produce clean baseload geothermal power together with battery-grade lithium and other critical minerals from a single integrated geothermal brine resource.
124 West 9th Street, Suite 101, Imperial, CA 92251 (US HQ); second office at L8, 167 Eagle Street, Brisbane, Qld 4000, AustraliaGeothermal / renewable baseload powerCritical minerals extraction and refiningBattery materials (lithium)Fertiliser (potash)Data-centre power supplyDefence-critical materialsControlled Thermal Resources Holdings, Inc. (CTR) is a U.S.-based developer of integrated geothermal power and critical minerals projects, headquartered in Imperial County, California, with additional offices in Brisbane, Australia, and Houston, Texas. Founded in 2013 and originally Australian-rooted before redomiciling to the United States in 2022, the company is focused on its flagship Hell's Kitchen Project in California's Imperial Valley, situated within the Salton Sea Geothermal Field. CTR operates through two wholly owned subsidiaries, American Data Power and American Critical Resources, pursuing a vertically integrated engineering model that generates renewable baseload geothermal electricity while simultaneously extracting and refining battery-grade lithium and other critical minerals from the same geothermal brine resource. The project is designed at full scale to deliver up to 650 megawatts of clean power and approximately 100,000 metric tons per year of lithium carbonate, along with additional U.S.-designated critical minerals including potash, zinc, manganese, rubidium, cesium, boron, and strontium. CTR's direct lithium extraction process uses a closed-loop system powered entirely by renewable energy, avoiding the environmental footprint of evaporation ponds or open-pit mining and requiring no offshore processing.
The company is led by CEO Rod Colwell, who also serves on California's Lithium Valley Commission, alongside President Jim Turner, CFO Eric Thayer, Chief of Staff Nicole Colwell, and Chief Communications Officer Lauren Rose, with a board that includes directors David Jackson, Nicholas Cavanagh, and Kemsley Cross, and former Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop as a special advisor. The leadership team brings over three decades of experience developing and operating large-scale geothermal energy projects in the Salton Sea region. CTR has raised more than $285 million in private capital to date, with investors including Stellantis, the California Energy Commission, and angel investors, according to PitchBook data. The company has secured a 25-year power purchase agreement with Imperial Irrigation District and has a supply contract with General Motors for battery-grade lithium. Technical and engineering partnerships include Baker Hughes, which completed a comprehensive Field Development Plan and a Definitive Feasibility Study compliant with SEC SK1300 standards, as well as Aquatech for integrated brine processing and Hatch Ltd for engineering. CTR has demonstrated its direct lithium extraction process on live geothermal brine at a 1/15 commercial-scale integrated facility and has invested approximately $185 million in long-lead equipment staged for construction.
In March 2026, CTR announced a definitive business combination agreement with Plum Acquisition Corp. IV (Nasdaq: PLMK), a special purpose acquisition company, at a pro forma enterprise value of approximately $4.7 billion and a pro forma equity value of roughly $5.0 billion. The transaction, unanimously approved by both boards, will result in CTR becoming a publicly traded company on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol "CTRH," with CTR shareholders rolling over 100% of their equity and expected to own approximately 90.6% of the combined company. The deal includes an earnout provision of up to 100 million shares over ten years tied to share price milestones, a domestication to Delaware, lock-up agreements, and an amended registration rights framework. The merger is expected to close in the second half of 2026, subject to shareholder approvals, SEC registration effectiveness, HSR Act clearance, and other customary conditions. Hall Chadwick served as CTR's exclusive corporate, financial, and lead capital markets advisor, while Cohen & Company Capital Markets advised Plum IV.
CTR is going public via SPAC to accelerate its development timeline and fund the commencement of Stage 1 construction at Hell's Kitchen, which is anticipated to include a 50 MW
Deal structureSEC-primary — BCA 8-K / S-4 / DEFM14A$3.1Bvs$4.7B+50% dilutionEffective equity counts every claim on the post-close company at $10.00 — rollover, public shares, the founder promote and the PIPE. The headline counts only the target.
- PIPE
- ≈ $13M · unsourced
- Min-cash condition
- $100M
- Sponsor promote
- 25%
- Exchange ratio
Company Options, Restricted Shares and Warrants convert at 'the Exchange Ratio (as defined in the Business Combination Agreement)'; the numeric ratio is not disclosed in the 8-K.more ▾less ▴
PIPE structure:PIPE contemplated but NOT signed at announcement — Plum IV may enter into PIPE Subscription Agreements from time to time before Closing; no size, price, structure or investors stated.more ▾less ▴
PIPE terms — instrument, coupon, conversion price and any reset floor — are not sourced for this deal. The size above is itself unsourced — a stored figure no filing we hold states — so neither the size nor the terms should be read as cited.
Earnout:Up to 100,000,000 Earnout Shares to Company Stockholders over a ten-year Earnout Period in VWAP-based tranches; the first tranche of 12,500,000 shares vests at a VWAP of $12.50 or more for 20 of any 30 consecutive trading days.more ▾less ▴
Minimum cash: $100M from the trust together with other financing, after transaction expenses.Outside date: 31 December 2026 — the contractual long-stop for closing. It is not a redemption deadline and confers no right to cash.Lock-up:CTRH and Founder Shares Lock-Up Period ” means with respect to each tranche of CTRH and Founder Shares Lock-Up Securities, the period commencing on the Closing Date and ending upon the earliest to occur of (i) the applicable Early Release Date for such tranche pursuant to Section 2.1, (ii) the date that is six (6) months following the Closing Date, or (iii) the Expiration Timemore ▾less ▴
What it is being valued atSEC-primary — the filed capitalisation tableThree different numbers are all called the deal value
They are not the same fact, and only the last one is what a valuation multiple may be struck on.
Pre-money equity value of the target$450MWhat Controlled Thermal Resources on its own is valued at, before a dollar of the SPAC's trust or the PIPE reaches it. This is the price agreed for the business itself.
Cash on the balance sheet at close$285Massumes 0% redemptions
Money the transaction puts INTO the company. It is counted inside the equity value above, which is why it comes straight back out to reach the figure below — nobody pays a revenue multiple for a bank balance.
Pro-forma enterprise value$3,338MThe combined company net of that cash — what the buyers are paying for the BUSINESS. Every multiple below is struck on this figure and on nothing else.
What that price is, per dollar of sales
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA — not shown
No EBITDA figure for Controlled Thermal Resources appears in any filing we hold, so no EV/EBITDA multiple is shown. We have not inferred one from a margin assumption — a multiple built on an assumed margin measures the assumption, not the company.
What qualifies these figures
- The equity and cash figures above assume NOBODY REDEEMS — the filing's own assumption, and the most favourable one available to it. Public shareholders in this market frequently redeem most of a trust; at a higher rate both figures fall together and the enterprise value the multiples are struck on does not move.
All figures above are stated in EX-99 investor presentation (August 2026 revision)0001213900-26-091866
EX-99 press release, 0001213900-26-024933: proFormaEnterpriseValueM "approximately $4.7 billion" — the sponsor rounding its own figure. A press release is a party's own claim, not a filed table: any stated capitalisation table supersedes it.
Who has already taken their money back
1 filed eventEach time shareholders were offered their cash back, some took it. Heavy cash-outs drain the account and shrink the number of shares left — whatever remains has to carry the deal.
Worst single event
78.49%
of the public float walked at a single vote
Shares redeemed, all events
13.54M
≈78% of the earliest known float
Every figure below is stated in the linked filing; nothing here is estimated.
- Jul 10, 2026Extension78.49%
Shareholder meeting July 10, 2026. Aggregate ~$145M.
The score
deterministic, from filed fieldsOne number for the shape of the bet: how much upside you are getting per unit of downside. It is arithmetic over filed fields, not a rating and not advice — and it is the same number this SPAC carries on the leaderboard, the screener and the deal list, because all four read one engine.
0.4% below the last filed trust — floor not confirmed — the last election has passed with nothing dated ahead
The blend is trust discount (40 points), deal stage (30), sponsor track record (18) and time to catalyst (12). Every input is a real sourced field; where one is missing, confidence drops rather than a number being invented.
The company
from SEC filingsRead the full profile
Plum Acquisition Corp. IV is a Cayman Islands-exempted blank check company incorporated for the purpose of effecting a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization, or similar business combination with one or more businesses. The company, headquartered at 2021 Fillmore St. #2089, San Francisco, California, is led by Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Kanishka Roy, who also serves as the managing member of the company's sponsor, Plum Partners IV, LLC. The SPAC's efforts to identify a target are not limited to any particular industry, sector, or geographic region, making it a generalist vehicle that intends to leverage its management team's global relationships and operating experience.
The company completed its initial public offering on January 15, 2025, raising $150,000,000 through the sale of 15,000,000 units at $10.00 per unit on Nasdaq, with common shares trading under the ticker PLMK. Each unit consisted of one Class A ordinary share and one-half of one redeemable public warrant, with each whole warrant exercisable at $11.50 per share. The underwriters were granted a 45-day option to purchase up to 2,250,000 additional units to cover over-allotments. Of the offering proceeds, $151,500,000 ($10.10 per unit) was deposited into a U.S.-based trust account maintained with Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company. The sponsor purchased 440,000 private placement units and 570,000 restricted private placement shares in a concurrent private placement at $10.00 per unit, for an aggregate of $4,400,000. The company's initial shareholders held 5,750,000 Class B founder shares acquired at a nominal price of approximately $0.003 per share.
Plum Acquisition Corp. IV has 18 months from the closing of its IPO to consummate an initial business combination, subject to possible extension periods with shareholder approval. If no business combination is completed within that timeframe, the company must redeem 100% of its public shares at a per-share price equal to the amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest. The company has announced a merger target in Controlled Thermal Resources, though specific deal terms were not detailed in the available filings.
Material findings
from the full read of every filingEvery document this company files gets read whole — body and exhibits. These are the ones the read flagged as material, newest first, each citing its filing.
The Updated Investor Presentation delivers extensive technical validation, third-party market sizing, and revised financial modeling that materially shape the investment thesis. Attributed entirely to the presentation and its cited sources: the combined company values the pre-transaction CTR enterprise at $3.15 billion, implying a $3.3 billion pro forma enterprise value, with CTR shareholders rolling over 100% of equity to hold approximately 90.4% of outstanding shares post-combination, while public shareholders are allocated roughly 1.1%. The capital stack plans to raise $25 million via convertible bridge and $100 million via PIPE in Q4 2026, followed by $418 million in power project debt (Q3 2027), $425 million in lithium equity (Q1 2028), and $1,025 million in lithium project debt (Q1 2028). Per CTR management and engineering consultants in the filing, Stage 1 power capacity targets 50 MW with approximately $475 million in remaining capital expenditures, targeting Final Investment Decision (FID) in Q2 2027 and commercial operation in Q4 2028. Stage 1 lithium extraction targets 25,000 tonnes per annum (TPA) toward a 100,000 TPA run-rate, requiring approximately $1.5 billion in construction capital with an FID scheduled for Q1 2028 and commercial operation in Q4 2030. Long-term phase expansions add potential for 200 MW stages (contracted to Baker Hughes for 600 MW total development across Stages 2–4) and additional mineral streams, including up to ~450,000 TPA of polymetallics and ~3,000,000 TPA of potash, currently under scoping study with no committed capital allocation. The filing cites Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory regarding a 4.1 million tonne proven and 18 million tonne probable lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) resource beneath the Salton Sea. Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE) recovery rates exceeding 97% are attributed to a demonstration plant operated for 770 hours at one-fifteenth commercial scale, utilizing Aquatech/Koch Technology Solutions processes. Third-party market projections referenced in the presentation estimate U.S. data center power demand exceeding 183 gigawatts by 2030 (citing Bank of America Global Research) and global lithium demand reaching 4.6 million tonnes LCE by 2035 (citing the International Energy Agency). Levelized Cost of Energy comparisons attribute approximately $51 to $71 per megawatt-hour to subsidised geothermal generation versus higher baseline costs for natural gas, coal, and nuclear (citing Lazard and the National Laboratory of the Rockies). Leadership bios identify Kanishka Roy as SPAC Chairman and CEO, Steven Handwerker as SPAC CFO and Director, and Rod Colwell as CTR CEO, supported by operational veterans including Jim Turner (President), Eric Thayer (CFO), and Maria Claudia Borras (Baker Hughes Chief Growth & Experience Officer). All revenue estimates, capacity projections, and valuation metrics remain forward-looking statements subject to customary business combination and resource development contingencies.
Beyond the capital table and redemption modeling, CTR management projects stage 1 power reaching commercial operation in 'Q4 2028' independent of the lithium phase, targeting '50 MW' initial capacity with approximately '$475 million' in remaining capital expenditures against a total power resource potential of '~1.1 GW'. Lithium development remains a 'returns-based decision' with a targeted final investment decision in 'Q1 2028', scaling toward '100,000 metric tons per annum' (LCE) at a projected capital requirement of roughly '$1.5 billion'. CTR leadership asserts battery-grade lithium recovery exceeds '97%' based on '770 hours' of demonstration plant operations at '1/15th' commercial scale, utilizing technology licensed from 'Koch Technology Solutions/Aquatech'. Independent partner commitments noted in the deck include 'Baker Hughes' being contracted for '600 MW' of later-stage development and authoring a definitive feasibility study supporting a '30-year operating life', alongside 'Fuji Electric' contracting for the stage 1 turbine. Regulatory progress claims state '15+' permits are secured, permitting is '98%' complete, the site holds federal 'FAST-41' designation, and a construction permit is targeted for 'November 2026'. Financial projections attribute future near-term annual revenues of approximately '$865 million' from power at '$160/$145/$130 per MWh' and '$2,200 million' from lithium at '$22,000/$20,000/$18,000 per TPA', carrying management-calculated margins of '84%' and '63%' respectively. Long-term optionality includes '~450,000 TPA' of polymetallics and '~3,000,000 TPA' of potash. For market sizing, the presentation cites 'Bank of America Global Research', the 'International Energy Agency', 'S&P Global', and 'Enerdatics' regarding a projected '230 GW' U.S. baseload power shortfall by 2030 driven by data centers, while attributing low levelized costs of energy to geothermal relative to nuclear and fossil fuels to 'Lazard' and the 'National Laboratory of the Rockies'. A sum-of-the-parts valuation framework prepared by the sponsor and CTR teams assigns a 'near-term' enterprise value of '$6,914 million' and a 'total' value of '$11,698 million' against a '$3,338 million' transaction entry price, claiming a '52%' discount to near-term metrics and a '71%' discount to long-term outputs.
The massive shareholder redemptions (~78% of public shares) dramatically reduced the trust available to fund the business combination, putting the deal at significant risk. The company is relying on a PIPE financing to meet the minimum cash condition, which is not yet assured. The amendment reducing target valuation by ~30% signals either a renegotiated deal or that the target's value changed substantially. The sponsor voluntarily converting nearly all Class B shares (just before the redemption deadline) suggests alignment efforts with public shareholders, but those converted shares can't access trust proceeds. The negative working capital and going concern warning are red flags for investors.
The filing repositions the recorded shareholder registry ahead of the 2027-01-16 redemption deadline. For investors monitoring redemption mechanics, trust preservation, and merger approval pathways, a newly identified multi-entity voting block clarifies which parties hold concentrated leverage over the shareholder vote. The filing indicates these holders maintained or increased their PLMK positions post-announcement rather than exercising redemptions, which mechanically reduces the residual share count available for cash-out and may support the sponsor’s fulfillment of minimum net tangible asset or financing conditions required to close the business combination. The document contains no information on customers, revenue, market size, strategy, technology, partnerships, litigation, or personnel.
The disclosed redemptions drastically deplete the SPAC's cash reserves to $39.7 million, severely limiting the financial resources available to close a business combination. Transferring extension authority from public shareholders to the board and Sponsor shifts control over the SPAC's lifespan, potentially accelerating or prolonging deal timelines without further holder input or dilution from redemption votes. The voluntary conversion of founder shares fundamentally realigns the capitalization table by stripping away nearly all restricted equity, leaving only one non-public share. This concentration of class structure alongside the reduced trust balance alters the risk-reward profile for remaining public investors and defines the baseline equity distribution for any prospective merger negotiation.
The revised April 30, 2027 outside closing date overrides the previously tracked January 16, 2027 deadline, indicating a structural departure from the original trust termination schedule that likely requires a formal extension filing or operates outside automatic liquidation triggers. Lowering the pre-capital raise valuation from $4,500,000,000 to $3,150,000,000 recalibrates the baseline equity multiple applied to trust proceeds, while shaving 30,000,000 shares off the earnout pool shifts residual dilution exposure away from SPAC trust accounts and onto post-combination market performance. Increasing the non-redeemer share pool to 3,000,000 reflects active sponsor liquidity preservation tactics designed to cap early redemptions ahead of the upcoming shareholder vote. Plum IV confirmed it will file a Form S-4 Registration Statement and preliminary Proxy Statement/Prospectus before distributing definitive proxy materials to trust shareholders for the extraordinary general meeting, establishing the next documented checkpoint for redemption ballot timing, warrant exercise eligibility, and final trust distribution calculations.
Show 24 more material filings
Lowering the transaction valuation to $3,150,000,000 and trimming 30,000,000 earnout shares fundamentally alters the economic upside and dilution profile for public shareholders versus target owners. Moving the closing window to April 30, 2027 pushes completion past the stated January 16, 2027 business combination deadline, meaning the SPAC must secure a formal extension and preserve the recorded $10.69 trust per share before that date to avoid liquidation. Raising non-redemption shares to 3,000,000 demonstrates active sponsor management of expected redemptions to protect trust capital. Executively, Chief Executive Officer Kanishka Roy and Controlled Thermal Resources President James Turner signed the amendment, which also contains forward-looking assertions about the combined entity’s plan to domesticate in Delaware and advance the Hell’s Kitchen Project, alongside explicitly flagged risks regarding lithium and critical mineral price volatility, development cost overruns, and regulatory environmental compliance. All transactional adjustments and strategic projections are sourced directly to the filed Second BCA Amendment, the accompanying 8-K narrative, and the executive signatories named therein.
This filing recalibrates the capital preservation and exit framework for PLMK by replacing an imminent liquidation trigger with a conditional extension pathway, while locking in a precise, trust-backed redemption floor of approximately $10.6973 against a near-term market valuation of $10.77. The authorization of post-extension board-level term adjustments upon sponsor request centralizes timeline control with Plum Partners IV, LLC and materially alters the governance profile for minority public shareholders. Explicit liquidity warnings indicate that secondary market transactions at premiums to the trust-derived redemption price may prove impossible, forcing holders to either accept the cash distribution, tender before the July 10, 2026 cutoff, or maintain exposure under the revised charter. These provisions directly govern trust drawdown sequencing, capital deployment windows, and the timing/risk parameters for redemption decisions across all registered share classes.
The disclosure forces an immediate redemption decision tomorrow against a hard trust floor that trades slightly below the referenced $10.77 secondary market price, while management explicitly warns that insufficient liquidity could trap holders who avoid redemption but seek an exit. The structural arrangement cedes post-January 2027 timing authority to the sponsor Plum Partners IV, LLC and the board via unilateral resolution, effectively preserving capital for twelve additional months while suspending further shareholder votes and market pricing discovery. For investors tracking trust depletion, extension pacing, and sponsor leverage, this filing confirms a prolonged hold period, centralized renewal discretion, and the continued absence of an announced merger target, financial metrics, or acquisition due diligence updates.
This filing establishes the binding redemption calendar and triggers a trust preservation strategy designed to limit outflows ahead of the extension vote. The documented non-redemption incentive ratio and per-investor caps signal the Sponsor’s active effort to maintain liquidity in the trust account while aligning external holder economics with continued operations. The Company attributes forward-looking projections regarding the number of executed agreements and actual transfer timing to its management, noting that 'NO ASSURANCES ARE MADE THAT A NON-REDEMPTION INCENTIVE OF ANY KIND WILL BE OFFERED AND THE ACTUAL TERMS... MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY.' The exhibit incorporates a 'Most Favored Nation' clause, granting participating investors the contractual right to adopt materially more favorable consideration terms if extended to other counterparties, which directly impacts negotiation leverage and trust dilution calculus. Pursuant to the Company’s stated policy, it will not utilize trust account funds to pay potential excise taxes under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 upon redemption, protecting remaining balances. The filing cross-references a Registration Rights Agreement and a Letter Agreement, both dated January 14, 2025, indicating ongoing structural and regulatory commitments. Reported by Chief Executive Officer Kanishka Roy on June 30, 2026.
This disclosure structurally redefines the immediate incentives surrounding the extension vote by replacing potential cash payments to non-redeeming shareholders with deferred, equity-based compensation tied directly to deal consummation. The Company's stated strategy aims to preserve trust capital by offering Founder Shares as a non-cash alternative to redemptions, while the explicit 9.9% participation cap and 1-to-7 payout ratio limit dilution. The mandatory Rule 10b-5 waiver compels participating investors to legally shield management from insider trading allegations during the solicitation window, altering standard disclosure norms for the campaign. The strict July 8 redemption cutoff forces public shareholders to make a binary choice between immediate liquidity and a delayed, transaction-contingent equity payout, fundamentally changing the redemption yield calculation ahead of the July 10 vote.
This administrative shift directly recalibrates the liquidity and voting timeline for public shareholders. The revised redemption window closes on July 8, 2026, granting investors eight additional days to elect cash-out rights before the extension vote. The postponement indicates management intends to continue shareholder outreach rather than convening immediately, which preserves the trust environment while keeping acquisition pursuits active. Procedural requirements outlined in the filing—such as the mandate to secure a control number from the transfer agent at 917-262-2373 or proxy@continentalstock.com up to 72 hours in advance—also establish the exact compliance path for broker-mediated and direct registrants to participate in the solicitation.
The administrative shift materially alters the redemption calendar by granting shareholders an additional eight days to elect to redeem their shares before voting on the extension amendment proposal. The proposed amendment would extend the initial business combination deadline to January 16, 2027, or to July 16, 2027 if all 6 additional monthly extensions are exercised. Preserving this window prevents forced liquidity traps and allows investors more time to evaluate the extension terms relative to the company's target search progress. Separately, the attached press release attributes its investment thesis to the sponsor's leadership, stating the team possesses a 'track record of sourcing and executing complex public-market transactions' and that Plum IV 'aims to identify companies positioned to deliver long-term value through technological advancements, disruptive business models, and secular long-term trends.' No deal target, purchase price, historical operating results, or active litigation details are disclosed in this submission.
This vote determines whether the SPAC will continue to pursue the CTR deal or liquidate. If the extension is not approved and no business combination closes by July 16, 2026, Plum will liquidate, redeeming public shares at approximately $10.67 per share (as of June 12, 2026) and warrants will expire worthless. The trust account holds about $184,121,199. The sponsor (Plum Partners IV, LLC) owns 27.9% of shares and will vote for the extension; they have invested $4,425,000 and would lose their entire investment in liquidation. Shareholders may redeem their shares in connection with the extension at a per-share price based on trust value. The filing provides redemption deadlines (June 30, 2026), voting requirements (two-thirds majority for extension), and details on sponsor conflicts of interest.
The proxy materially restructures the trust preservation timeline by deferring the liquidation trigger by roughly 18 months while shifting post-January 16, 2027 extension authority from shareholder votes to unilateral board resolutions activated solely by Sponsor requests. The mandatory pre-meeting tender deadline and 15% redemption ceiling directly constrain cash exit pathways and amplify liquidity risk for public holders, particularly because the Registration Statement is already effective yet closure is deliberately postponed. Sponsor economics remain insulated through waived liquidation distributions and concentrated voting control, effectively pressuring public shareholders to either cash out at the recorded trust balance or sustain a thinly traded entity awaiting regulatory and operational finalization with CTR.
Compressing these internal covenants tightens the operational path toward the SPAC’s fixed business combination deadline, which directly dictates the sequencing of the upcoming S-4/Proxy Statement/Prospectus filing, record date establishment, and shareholder vote calendar where redemption windows open. The 50/50 antitrust fee split increases purchaser transaction costs, while the mutual-consent restriction on HSR extensions removes unilateral delaying power for either side. Per the filing’s forward-looking statements section, Plum IV and the Company attribute to themselves expectations regarding the combined entity’s future financial performance, expected trading on Nasdaq, and the building of the Company’s flagship Hell’s Kitchen Project. Management also identifies industry-specific exposures, including fluctuations in demand and prices for lithium and other critical minerals, potential capital expenditure delays or cost overruns, and compliance, environmental, and safety obligations. The Class A ordinary shares’ associated whole warrants remain exercisable at an exercise price of $11.50. Plum IV plans to transfer by way of continuation from the Cayman Islands to Delaware and domesticate as a Delaware corporation prior to Closing.
Postponing financial and antitrust deliverables delays the compilation and SEC filing of the Form S-4 Registration Statement and Proxy Statement/Prospectus, which indirectly pushes back the schedule for shareholder voting and potential redemption windows. The filing makes no alteration to the SPAC’s contractual business combination termination date, maintains existing trust account distribution protocols, and does not introduce new sponsorship governance or penalty clauses. Management’s forward-looking statements, as explicitly attributed in the filing’s risk section, project anticipated closing benefits, Nasdaq trading expectations, and strategic development of the flagship Hell’s Kitchen Project. The parties’ enumerated risk factors specifically highlight exposure to lithium and other critical mineral price volatility, exploration and development cost overruns, raw material securing challenges, environmental and safety compliance obligations, and geopolitical disruptions. Executive signatories confirm Kanishka Roy as Chief Executive Officer and President of the purchasing entities, and James Turner as President of the target. Cover page data notes whole warrants carry an $11.50 exercise price. The stated $10.69 per share trust value and January 16, 2027 deadline from the initial case parameters remain unmodified by this amendment.
The filing confirms the announced deal with CTR, updates trust value (key for redemption calculations), and highlights liquidity and going concern risks. The deadline is approaching, making timely shareholder vote and deal closing critical.
The filing confirms the CTR deal is announced, but only 60% of CTR stockholders are locked in via a transaction support agreement; there is no PIPE or minimum cash condition disclosed yet. The trust balance is ~$181.3 million, well above the initial $10.10 per share. However, the company has a working capital deficit of $70,710, cash of only $296,249, and the auditor flags substantial doubt about going concern if the merger fails by the July 14, 2026 deadline. The sponsor note can convert into equity at $10.00 per share, which is dilutive and below trust value. Note 5 reports a delayed Section 16 filing for a 25,000-share director transfer on April 25, 2025.
This filing is the definitive agreement for the SPAC's business combination, providing investors with the full terms of the merger, consideration structure, earnout, financing commitments, redemption incentives, and conditions to closing. The target is a lithium developer (Hell's Kitchen Project) in a critical minerals sector. The trust value is $10.69 per share, and the deadline is January 16, 2027, but the outside date for the deal is December 31, 2026. The minimum cash condition of $100 million and sponsor-backed PIPE provide a floor on trust proceeds. The earnout structure and lock-up release thresholds create alignment with stock price performance.
This filing confirms that Plum IV has found and signed its merger partner, Controlled Thermal Resources, moving from a blank-check shell into a definitive business combination. For the first time, investors see the valuation framework: a $4.5 billion enterprise value (implied by Aggregate Merger Consideration, computed from Public Company (Pre-Capital Raise) Valuation of $4.5B divided by Per Share Price), earnout triggers, the trust size ($179.2M minimum), the minimum cash to close ($100M), and the source of additional financing. The document also discloses that CTR's business is lithium and geothermal at the Hell's Kitchen Project. The trust per-share value of $10.69 is above the $10.00 baseline, but the redemption deadline and the negotiated $100M minimum cash condition mean any excess redemptions above the implied trust outflow could kill the deal. The outside date of December 31, 2026, and the Material Consents deadline of May 7, 2026, are key calendar items. The Sponsor's commitment to fund at least $15M in PIPE and the requirement for a $10M bridge note provide some floor on available cash. The earnout structure connects seller consideration to post-close stock performance.
The documented assumptions directly anchor redemption calculus and post-closing liquidity: a zero-redemption model dictates the baseline trust-derived capital (~$180 million plus accrued interest) feeding the combined entity’s initial construction funding, thereby defining the dilution profile and execution runway before the January 16, 2027 deadline expires. Beyond mechanics, the press release and presentation advance numerous operational, strategic, and financial claims attributed to specific parties and external sources. CEO Rod Colwell and CEO Kanishka Roy frame the Hell’s Kitchen Project as delivering up to 650 megawatts of clean baseload power and 100,000 metric tons per year of lithium carbonate to service hyperscale data center and AI infrastructure growth, citing U.S. Department of Energy directives, IEA, Goldman Sachs, and EIA data forecasting 134 gigawatts of new U.S. baseload demand by 2030 and data centers consuming roughly 8% of national power by that date. Management attributes accelerating lithium consumption to battery energy storage systems (BESS), referencing projections of 700,000-plus tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent by 2035 from BMI, Rho Motion, Canaccord Genuity, and a 2025 DoD Battery Briefing. Financial forecasts in the presentation, attributed to a Definitive Feasibility Study prepared by Baker Hughes under SEC S-K 1300 guidelines, outline Stage 1 annual revenue trajectories ranging from $3.481 billion to $4.307 billion based on variable product pricing, with estimated operating margins of approximately 72% for power generation and 58% for lithium production. Permitting milestones are credited to Imperial County Planning and Development Services (Conditional Use Permit secured January 2024), federal FAST-41 interagency coordination, and California Regional Water Quality Control Board approvals. Technology and commercial partnerships cited include Baker Hughes for field development planning, Aquatech for direct lithium extraction processes, Imperial Valley College for local workforce training, and unspecified strategic investments from global automotive manufacturers. Advisory teams are identified as Hall Chadwick and Cohen & Company Capital Markets for financial execution, Greenberg Traurig LLP for Plum IV legal counsel, and Duane Morris LLP for CTR legal counsel. All projections, capacity targets, peer valuation benchmarks, and risk disclosures remain expressly conditional upon shareholder ratification, SEC registration statement effectiveness, HSR waiting period expiration, and customary closing criteria.
According to the attached press release and investor presentation, CTR advances the Hell’s Kitchen Project in California’s Salton Sea basin. Management projects up to 650 MW of renewable baseload power and 100,000 metric tons per year of lithium carbonate at full buildout, alongside 3,000,000 metric tons per year of potash and 450,000 metric tons per year of polymetallics (zinc/manganese). Stage 1 targets 50 MW of power and 25,000 metric tons per year of lithium. CTR attributes $285 million in private capital deployed to date, a January 2024 conditional use permit, and federal FAST-41 project designation. Technology claims originate from a demonstration optimization facility that operated Direct Lithium Extraction for 770 hours at 1/15th commercial scale, achieving greater than 97% lithium recovery. A Baker Hughes Definitive Feasibility Study prepared under SEC S-K 1300 guidelines supports a 30-year operating life for Stage 1. Market narratives cite data centers consuming more than 134 GW of new U.S. baseload power by 2030 and global lithium demand doubling by 2035, sourced to IEA, Goldman Sachs, and Department of Defense briefings. The transaction implies a $4.5 billion pre-money equity value and ~$4.7 billion pro forma enterprise value, structured around a $4.5 billion CTR rollover, a $125 million convertible note and PIPE priced at $10.00 per share, and the ~$180 million trust balance. Forward-looking financial models estimate up to $4.3 billion in annual revenue at capacity, with management attributing Stage 1 margin expectations of roughly 72% for power and 58% for lithium. Explicit risks flagged by both parties include failure to obtain shareholder approval, inability to complete by the SPAC deadline, permitting reversals, construction delays, cost overruns, and commodity price volatility.
The presentation attributes multiple operational and market claims exclusively to ACR, noting Plum IV makes no representation regarding their accuracy. ACR President Jim Turner and Strategic Advisor David Andrada describe a Direct Lithium Extraction process operating at 1/15 th commercial scale for 770 hours, achieving greater than 97 % lithium recovery and producing lithium chloride converted to lithium hydroxide monohydrate. Stage 1 capacity is claimed at 50 MW power, ~100,000 tpa lithium, ~450,000+ tpa polymetallics, and ~3,000,000+ tpa potash. ACR states $285M was invested over 12 Years across two existing ~25 MW e wells at the Hell’s Kitchen project in Imperial County, California, with a Conditional Use Permit obtained in January 2024. Market context cites data centers using more than 134 GW of new baseload power by 2030, global lithium demand doubling by 2035, BESS requiring over 700,000 tonnes LCE by 2035, and the U.S. importing ~93% of potash needs. Leadership biographies list Rod Colwell as CEO & Board Director, Jim Turner as President & Board Director, Eric Thayer as CFO, Danny Suubam as Manager of Geology, Paul Mead as Senior Environmental Permitting Manager, Gerald Font as General Project Manager, and Lauren Rose as Chief Communications Officer. Because all metrics are supplied solely by ACR under explicit forward-looking disclaimers, they reflect management’s developmental projections rather than audited corporate performance or binding contractual commitments.
For redemption and trust monitoring, the lack of a definitive agreement preserves the current liquidation deadline and keeps the trust intact, with no proxy solicitation or redemption window initiated. However, the disclosed financing roadmap signals substantial pre-closing capital formation that will structurally define post-combination equity dilution and liquidity cushions. Because the prospectus explicitly disclaims independent verification, attributing all capacity, technological, and market-size assertions solely to ACR and its advisors, investors must treat the stated metrics and partnership references as unreinforced projections until the S-4 registration statement subjects them to SEC review and auditor scrutiny. Tracking the transition from soft-sounding to hard PIPE commitments will be the next critical indicator of deal viability before shareholders face a formal redemption election.
This announcement shifts investor focus toward fundamental validation while preserving standard SPAC exit mechanics. All subsequent financial terms, redemption procedures, lock-up arrangements, and projected holdco capitalization will be disclosed in a future Form S-4 and preliminary proxy statement once a definitive agreement is executed. Until then, shareholders may redeem shares for their pro rata trust value without penalty. The press release also discloses key transaction participants: Hall Chadwick is serving as exclusive financial and lead capital markets advisor to ACR; Cohen & Company Capital Markets serves the same role for Plum IV; Greenberg Traurig, LLP advises Plum IV; and Duane Morris LLP advises ACR. Subject to these structural safeguards, the filing contains substantive operational claims attributed entirely to ACR and unverified by the SPAC: ACR expects its Hell’s Kitchen development at the Salton Sea in California to deliver approximately 50 megawatts of renewable baseload electricity and an estimated annual production of up to 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate over four project stages. The company states it has secured over US$ 285 million in private investment to date and completed a Definitive Feasibility Study validated by Baker Hughes. Additionally, ACR notes that research and development is targeting additional critical minerals identified by the Idaho National Laboratory, including potash, zinc, manganese, rubidium, cesium, and rare earth materials. CTR CEO Rod Colwell asserts the project will “supercharge domestic supply chains,” while Plum IV CEO Kanishka Roy characterizes the combination as a “significant opportunity to support a strategic U.S. initiative.” Both leadership teams caution that the letter of intent is non-binding, definitive terms may differ materially, and consummation requires board approvals, shareholder votes, regulatory clearances, and customary closing conditions.
This filing moves the SPAC into active target evaluation, anchoring redemption-era decision-making well ahead of the January 16, 2027 deadline. Per the press release, which explicitly states that all information concerning American Critical Resources was provided solely by ACR and not independently verified by Plum IV, ACR claims its Hell’s Kitchen project in Imperial County, California, is designed to deliver approximately 50 megawatts of renewable baseload electricity and an estimated annual production of up to 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate across four project stages. ACR further claims the venture has secured over US$ 285 million in private investment to date, completed a Definitive Feasibility Study validated by Baker Hughes, and is conducting research and development to unlock potash, zinc, manganese, rubidium, cesium, and rare earth materials identified by the Idaho National Laboratory. Rod Colwell, CEO of CTR, asserts the resource will supercharge domestic supply chains and expand U.S. leadership in low-carbon minerals exports. Kanishka Roy, CEO of Plum IV, states the alliance advances U.S. supply chain resilience and represents a significant opportunity to support strategic national initiatives while creating long-term shareholder value. Because Plum IV formally disclaims verification obligations until a definitive agreement is executed, public shareholders must evaluate the stated megawatt output, lithium tonnage, private funding total, and mineral recovery roadmap as unsubstantiated projections when calculating redemption thresholds and expected post-merger enterprise value.
The trust per-share value ($10.29) has increased from the initial $10.10 due to interest, but the SPAC faces a tight deadline and a going concern warning. The new sponsor loan provides short-term liquidity but signals the sponsor's willingness to support the process. No target has been announced, making the extension deadline the next critical event for public shareholders.
This financing mechanism provides targeted liquidity up to $1,500,000 conditional on deal closure, removing immediate repayment pressure or interest costs while legally insulating the trust account from sponsor recourse. The $10.00 conversion pricing establishes a defined equity valuation floor for sponsor contributions upon merger. Because the instrument auto-forgives without a completed transaction, it aligns sponsor incentives toward deal execution without introducing monthly debt servicing obligations or threatening the shareholder redemption pool ahead of the January 16, 2027 deadline.
Establishes baseline financial condition post-IPO. Trust value per share slightly above $10.10 may affect future redemption math. The going concern warning signals time pressure, which may influence sponsor behavior or deal timeline. No extension yet disclosed. The filing provides the first cash burn rate and expense visibility for investors tracking deal progress.
Showing the 30 most recent of 46 filings flagged material — the full feed is in Filings below.
Filings
live EDGAR feedEverything this company has filed with the SEC recently, newest first, each with a plain summary of what changed and why it matters.
What changed: SEC Form 8-K filing a Rule 425 written communication containing an updated investor presentation for the proposed business combination between Plum Acquisition Corp. IV and Controlled Thermal Resources Holdings Inc. The filing furnishes an Updated Investor Presentation (dated August 2026) that supersedes the version originally furnished as Exhibit 99.1 on March 9, 2026. Mechanically, it reaffirms the proposed business combination without altering the contractual business combination deadline of January 16, 2027. The presentation models a $10.00 per share transaction price and references approximately $40 million in Plum IV cash in trust as of August 14, 2026. While the pro forma ownership table assumes 0% redemptions, the documentation explicitly notes that Controlled Thermal Resources has structured its capital raise to ensure liquidity even if Plum IV experiences a 100% redemption rate. No extensions, amendments to the redemption calendar, or changes to sponsor equity lock-ups are disclosed; the Plum sponsor retains a stated 2.0% advisory interest, and directors and officers continue their fiduciary obligations as documented participants in the proxy solicitation. Deal progress remains at the pre-proxy stage, with a Registration Statement on Form S-4 and preliminary Proxy Statement/Prospectus anticipated prior to an Extraordinary General Meeting. Why it matters: The Updated Investor Presentation delivers extensive technical validation, third-party market sizing, and revised financial modeling that materially shape the investment thesis. Attributed entirely to the presentation and its cited sources: the combined company values the pre-transaction CTR enterprise at $3.15 billion, implying a $3.3 billion pro forma enterprise value, with CTR shareholders rolling over 100% of equity to hold approximately 90.4% of outstanding shares post-combination, while public shareholders are allocated roughly 1.1%. The capital stack plans to raise $25 million via convertible bridge and $100 million via PIPE in Q4 2026, followed by $418 million in power project debt (Q3 2027), $425 million in lithium equity (Q1 2028), and $1,025 million in lithium project debt (Q1 2028). Per CTR management and engineering consultants in the filing, Stage 1 power capacity targets 50 MW with approximately $475 million in remaining capital expenditures, targeting Final Investment Decision (FID) in Q2 2027 and commercial operation in Q4 2028. Stage 1 lithium extraction targets 25,000 tonnes per annum (TPA) toward a 100,000 TPA run-rate, requiring approximately $1.5 billion in construction capital with an FID scheduled for Q1 2028 and commercial operation in Q4 2030. Long-term phase expansions add potential for 200 MW stages (contracted to Baker Hughes for 600 MW total development across Stages 2–4) and additional mineral streams, including up to ~450,000 TPA of polymetallics and ~3,000,000 TPA of potash, currently under scoping study with no committed capital allocation. The filing cites Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory regarding a 4.1 million tonne proven and 18 million tonne probable lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) resource beneath the Salton Sea. Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE) recovery rates exceeding 97% are attributed to a demonstration plant operated for 770 hours at one-fifteenth commercial scale, utilizing Aquatech/Koch Technology Solutions processes. Third-party market projections referenced in the presentation estimate U.S. data center power demand exceeding 183 gigawatts by 2030 (citing Bank of America Global Research) and global lithium demand reaching 4.6 million tonnes LCE by 2035 (citing the International Energy Agency). Levelized Cost of Energy comparisons attribute approximately $51 to $71 per megawatt-hour to subsidised geothermal generation versus higher baseline costs for natural gas, coal, and nuclear (citing Lazard and the National Laboratory of the Rockies). Leadership bios identify Kanishka Roy as SPAC Chairman and CEO, Steven Handwerker as SPAC CFO and Director, and Rod Colwell as CTR CEO, supported by operational veterans including Jim Turner (President), Eric Thayer (CFO), and Maria Claudia Borras (Baker Hughes Chief Growth & Experience Officer). All revenue estimates, capacity projections, and valuation metrics remain forward-looking statements subject to customary business combination and resource development contingencies.
What changed: Form 8-K furnishing an updated investor presentation (Exhibit 99.1) under Regulation FD Disclosure, which supersedes a March 9, 2026 deck and outlines the proposed business combination mechanics, capital raise sequence, operational milestones, and target company financial projections for Controlled Thermal Resources Holdings Inc. (CTR). The filing updates the proposed business combination announcement by detailing a staged capital raise anchored by a '$25 million bridge' in Q3 2026, a '$100 million PIPE' and convertible note priced at '$10.00 per share' at deal close in Q4 2026, and subsequent '$418 million' in power project debt (Q3 2027) and '$1,450 million' combined lithium equity/debt (Q1 2028). It explicitly discloses that CTR's internal planning models both a '0%' and '100%' shareholder redemption scenario to preserve trust liquidity from '~$40 million' in Plum IV cash-in-trust as of 8/14/26. The document reiterates the existing risk that 'the Transactions may not be completed by Plum IV’s business combination deadline' and that an extension may fail, while outlining pro forma post-combination equity splits showing CTR insiders retaining '90.4%', public shareholders holding '1.1%', PIPE/converter holders receiving '3.6%', advisory interests claiming '2.9%', and the Plum sponsor maintaining '2.0%' of '348.3 million' total shares. Why it matters: Beyond the capital table and redemption modeling, CTR management projects stage 1 power reaching commercial operation in 'Q4 2028' independent of the lithium phase, targeting '50 MW' initial capacity with approximately '$475 million' in remaining capital expenditures against a total power resource potential of '~1.1 GW'. Lithium development remains a 'returns-based decision' with a targeted final investment decision in 'Q1 2028', scaling toward '100,000 metric tons per annum' (LCE) at a projected capital requirement of roughly '$1.5 billion'. CTR leadership asserts battery-grade lithium recovery exceeds '97%' based on '770 hours' of demonstration plant operations at '1/15th' commercial scale, utilizing technology licensed from 'Koch Technology Solutions/Aquatech'. Independent partner commitments noted in the deck include 'Baker Hughes' being contracted for '600 MW' of later-stage development and authoring a definitive feasibility study supporting a '30-year operating life', alongside 'Fuji Electric' contracting for the stage 1 turbine. Regulatory progress claims state '15+' permits are secured, permitting is '98%' complete, the site holds federal 'FAST-41' designation, and a construction permit is targeted for 'November 2026'. Financial projections attribute future near-term annual revenues of approximately '$865 million' from power at '$160/$145/$130 per MWh' and '$2,200 million' from lithium at '$22,000/$20,000/$18,000 per TPA', carrying management-calculated margins of '84%' and '63%' respectively. Long-term optionality includes '~450,000 TPA' of polymetallics and '~3,000,000 TPA' of potash. For market sizing, the presentation cites 'Bank of America Global Research', the 'International Energy Agency', 'S&P Global', and 'Enerdatics' regarding a projected '230 GW' U.S. baseload power shortfall by 2030 driven by data centers, while attributing low levelized costs of energy to geothermal relative to nuclear and fossil fuels to 'Lazard' and the 'National Laboratory of the Rockies'. A sum-of-the-parts valuation framework prepared by the sponsor and CTR teams assigns a 'near-term' enterprise value of '$6,914 million' and a 'total' value of '$11,698 million' against a '$3,338 million' transaction entry price, claiming a '52%' discount to near-term metrics and a '71%' discount to long-term outputs.
Show the other 10 filings
What changed: A routine SEC compliance exhibit (Schedule 13G/A amendment) reporting beneficial ownership of PLMK equity by Meteora Capital, LLC. The provided excerpt discloses no numerical changes in share count, percentage ownership, acquisition cost, or purpose of acquisition attributable to Meteora Capital, LLC. Consequently, the filing records no explicit updates regarding redemption deadlines, trust value distributions, extension timelines, deal execution progress, or sponsor conduct. The text also contains zero attributed statements concerning customers, revenue, market size, strategy, technology, partnerships, litigation, or personnel. Why it matters: Schedule 13G/A amendments track institutional position adjustments that can influence voting dynamics, liquidity conditions, and post-merger governance as a SPAC navigates structural milestones. Monitoring how holders like Meteora Capital, LLC adjust stakes relative to the 10% beneficial ownership threshold helps investors anticipate whether large shareholders are preparing for, supporting, or exiting ahead of redemption windows, extension votes, or merger completions. Without the full amendment data, the specific capital allocation timing, shareholder alignment, or impact on deal progression remains indeterminate.(flagged for human review)
What changed: Quarterly report (Form 10-Q) for Plum Acquisition Corp. IV for the period ended June 30, 2026, filed to disclose the financial condition of this SPAC, which has announced a business combination. The SPAC held an extraordinary general meeting on July 10, 2026, where shareholders approved an extension of the business combination deadline from July 16, 2026 to January 16, 2027, with the ability to extend further monthly until July 16, 2027. In connection with that vote, holders of 13,540,384 public shares redeemed at approximately $10.71 per share, for an aggregate redemption of ~$145 million, leaving ~$39.7 million in the trust account. Also on July 9, 2026, the sponsor and independent directors voluntarily converted 5,749,999 Class B shares into Class A shares, leaving one Class B share outstanding after redemptions. The trust value dropped from $184.4M to ~$39.7M as a result. The business combination agreement with CTR was amended on July 6, 2026, reducing the valuation used to calculate merger consideration from $4.5B to $3.15B, reducing earnout shares from 100M to 70M, extending the closing deadline to April 30, 2027, increasing the maximum shares issuable for non-redeeming shareholders from 2M to 3M, and extending the antitrust filing deadline to September 30, 2026. Working capital was negative $1.4M at June 30, 2026, and the company acknowledged substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Why it matters: The massive shareholder redemptions (~78% of public shares) dramatically reduced the trust available to fund the business combination, putting the deal at significant risk. The company is relying on a PIPE financing to meet the minimum cash condition, which is not yet assured. The amendment reducing target valuation by ~30% signals either a renegotiated deal or that the target's value changed substantially. The sponsor voluntarily converting nearly all Class B shares (just before the redemption deadline) suggests alignment efforts with public shareholders, but those converted shares can't access trust proceeds. The negative working capital and going concern warning are red flags for investors.
What changed vs 2026-05-15trust $182.7M → $184.4M +1%deadline 2026-07-16 → 2027-04-30trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt +12 moved · 2 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $182.7M$184.4M
- Combination deadline
- 2026-07-162027-04-30
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Redeemable shares
- 17.3M · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $1,680,837 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“current assets 383,848 393,225 Long-term prepaid expenses — 3,542 Investments held in Trust Account 184,416,026 181,285,220 Total Assets $ 184,799,874 $ 181,681,987 Liabilities, Class A Ordinary Shares Subject to Possible Redemption,”…
SpacBrain reads this as 288 days later than the previous record.
The clause “(iv) extend the date by which the closing must occur from December 31, 2026 to April 30, 2027; (v) reduce the valuation used to calculate the merger consideration from $4,500,000,000 to $3,150,000,000; and (vi) extend the deadlines by”…
The clause …“Codification (“ASC”) Topic 205-40, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern,” as of June 30, 2026, management has determined that mandatory liquidation, should a Business Combination not occur, and potential subsequent”…
The clause “0,000,000 shares authorized; 1,242,875 shares issued and outstanding (excluding 17,250,000 shares subject to possible redemption) as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 124 124 Class B ordinary shares, $ 0.0001 par value; 20,000,000”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
What changed: Schedule 13G/A (Amended Beneficial Ownership Report). The supplied excerpt provides no amendment data, share quantities, percentage stakes, or effective dates. It exclusively lists three related entities as co-filers: AQR Capital Management, LLC; AQR Capital Management Holdings, LLC; and AQR Arbitrage, LLC. An amended 13G typically discloses a change in ownership crossing the 5% threshold, a shift between sole and shared voting or investment power, or a correction to prior disclosures, but none of those operational specifics appear in the text provided. Why it matters: In a SPAC environment with a declared deal, a $10.69 per-share trust, and a 2027-01-16 deadline, institutional ownership filings monitor how arbitrage desks and asset managers position capital ahead of shareholder redemptions, merger approvals, or sponsor extensions. The presence of AQR Arbitrage, LLC alongside management arms suggests potential merger-arbitrage or market-neutral positioning rather than long-horizon equity conviction, which directly impacts floating share liquidity and redemption pressure dynamics. Because the excerpt contains zero numerical metrics, amendment reasons, or transaction dates tied to Plum IV, investors cannot yet determine whether the filing reflects accumulation, distribution, administrative restructuring, or a mere periodic update relative to the redemption or extension timeline.
What changed: SEC Schedule 13G (beneficial ownership report). Context Capital Management, LLC, Michael S. Rosen, William D. Fertig, Charles E. Carnegie, and Context Partners Master Fund, L.P. filed jointly to report aggregate beneficial ownership exceeding five percent of PLMK common stock. The excerpt lists only the reporting persons; it does not disclose the exact percentage, share quantity, acquisition price, or date of purchase. Why it matters: The filing repositions the recorded shareholder registry ahead of the 2027-01-16 redemption deadline. For investors monitoring redemption mechanics, trust preservation, and merger approval pathways, a newly identified multi-entity voting block clarifies which parties hold concentrated leverage over the shareholder vote. The filing indicates these holders maintained or increased their PLMK positions post-announcement rather than exercising redemptions, which mechanically reduces the residual share count available for cash-out and may support the sponsor’s fulfillment of minimum net tangible asset or financing conditions required to close the business combination. The document contains no information on customers, revenue, market size, strategy, technology, partnerships, litigation, or personnel.
What changed: A Schedule 13G Joint Filing Agreement (Exhibit A) authorizing Linden Capital L.P., Linden GP LLC, Linden Advisors LP, and Siu Min Wong to submit a single beneficial ownership statement for Plum Acquisition Corp. IV shares on July 16, 2026, pursuant to Rule 13d-1(k), executed solely by Saul Ahn in multiple representative capacities. This filing addresses zero variables in the redemption deadline (stated as 2027-01-16), trust value per share ($10.69), extension procedures, deal progression, or sponsor governance. It is a routine procedural bundle that consolidates existing reporting obligations for the named affiliates under Exchange Act Section 13(d) and Securities Exchange Act of 1934 provisions. The document introduces no new equity percentages, voting directives, tender schedules, or cash distribution mechanics. Attribution for all statements rests entirely with the listed holders and their authorized signatory, Saul Ahn, who cites only a June 10, 2019 Power of Attorney and references an unrelated June 19, 2019 filing for Haymaker Acquisition Corp II. Why it matters: Because the exhibit contains no forward-looking assertions, commercial data, or mechanical triggers, it offers no new intelligence for tracking shareholder redemptions, trust account utilization, or merger negotiation milestones. Investors monitoring sponsor behavior or target company fundamentals will find no disclosures regarding customers, revenue projections, market positioning, proprietary technology, strategic partnerships, active litigation, or executive appointments. Its sole utility is confirming that the Linden affiliates and Siu Min Wong remain bundled compliants for regulatory reporting purposes on the PLMK security, requiring no adjustment to position sizing or timeline tracking based on new filings.
What changed: A Form 8-K current report filed by Plum Acquisition Corp. IV that discloses shareholder approval of charter amendments to extend the business combination deadline, alongside announcements of extensive public share redemptions and voluntary founder share conversions. According to the registrant's filing, shareholders voted to amend the company's Articles to extend the Termination Date from July 16, 2026, to January 16, 2027. The same vote authorized the board of directors to subsequently extend the deadline monthly up to six additional times without a shareholder vote, provided Plum Partners IV, LLC requests it in writing and gives five days' notice, establishing a firm final expiration of July 16, 2027. In connection with the meeting, the registrant states that holders of 13,540,384 Public Shares exercised their redemption right at a price of approximately $10.71 per share, withdrawing an aggregate of approximately $145 million from the trust account and leaving approximately $39.7 million in the trust. Additionally, Plum IV reports that on July 9, 2026, the Sponsor and independent directors voluntarily converted 5,749,999 Class B Ordinary Shares into Class A Ordinary Shares. Following these actions, the company has 10,702,490 Class A Ordinary Shares outstanding and a single Class B Ordinary Share held by the Sponsor. Why it matters: The disclosed redemptions drastically deplete the SPAC's cash reserves to $39.7 million, severely limiting the financial resources available to close a business combination. Transferring extension authority from public shareholders to the board and Sponsor shifts control over the SPAC's lifespan, potentially accelerating or prolonging deal timelines without further holder input or dilution from redemption votes. The voluntary conversion of founder shares fundamentally realigns the capitalization table by stripping away nearly all restricted equity, leaving only one non-public share. This concentration of class structure alongside the reduced trust balance alters the risk-reward profile for remaining public investors and defines the baseline equity distribution for any prospective merger negotiation.
What changed: SEC Form 4 — insider ownership report filed by Plum Acquisition Corp, IV on 2026-07-13. Director Aghamiri Aidin reported a conversion transaction on 2026-07-09 that resulted in the acquisition of 25,000 shares, leaving the reporting person with a total post-transaction holding of 25,000 shares. Why it matters: The filing exclusively tracks a single director’s post-conversion equity position and contains no provisions affecting the $10.69 trust per share, the 2027-01-16 redemption deadline, business combination progress, extension voting, or sponsor conduct. As stated in the Form 4 by Mr. Aghamiri and Plum Acquisition Corp, IV, this routine ownership disclosure does not modify the SPAC’s capitalization timeline, redemption mechanics, or announced deal status.
What changed: Form 4 — insider ownership report for Plum Acquisition Corp IV, filed to publicly log a securities position change by a corporate affiliate. Per the filing text, PLUM PARTNERS IV, LLC (described in the document as a 10% owner) executed a conversion on 2026-07-09, acquiring 5,649,999 shares and holding 6,659,999 shares afterward. Regarding SPAC mechanics, the document discloses no adjustments to the redemption threshold, the trust-per-share balance, the business combination deadline, any proposed extension schedules, or active merger agreement milestones. Concerning sponsor conduct, the record shows a routine post-announcement equity conversion without associated resignations, board rotations, or voting-control alterations. Why it matters: For investors tracking deal progress and redemption exposure, this conversion signals standard founder-class positioning rather than a catalyst for trust redepositions or deadline extensions. The filing contains no asserted claims about target customers, projected revenue, addressable market size, proprietary technology, commercial partnerships, pending litigation, or executive personnel movements. According to the reported text, the transaction exclusively documents the sponsor’s internal share accumulation at the stated counts, confirming concentrated equity alignment while introducing no new contractual terms, operational disclosures, or timeline modifiers that would materially shift investment thesis execution or cash-out mechanics.
What changed: This document is a Form 4 insider ownership report filed on 2026-07-13 (SEC accession number 0001213900-26-077740) submitted by Roy Kanishka, identified as director, Chief Executive Officer, and 10% owner of Plum Acquisition Corp., IV. The filing discloses that as of 2026-07-09, Roy Kanishka converted and acquired 5,649,999 shares, resulting in a total post-transaction holding of 6,659,999 shares. Regarding the specified tracking mechanics, the report contains no amendments, board resolutions, or shareholder notices that modify the redemption deadline of 2027-01-16, adjust the trust valuation at $10.69, trigger or reject an extension, alter the announced deal progress, or reflect sponsor conduct beyond this standard insider equity conversion. Why it matters: Because the document attributes only the reported share conversion to Roy Kanishka, it does not introduce new revenue forecasts, customer concentration claims, market size estimates, technology roadmap disclosures, partnership terms, litigation filings, or executive departures that would otherwise shift investment risk. The acquisition of 5,649,999 shares concentrates voting and economic exposure in management without altering the trust account’s $10.69 per-share baseline or the 2027-01-16 liquidation horizon, meaning redemption mechanics, capital allocation timelines, and sponsor behavior remain unchanged for portfolio tracking purposes.
What changed: A Rule 425 written communication (Form 8-K) disclosing a Second Amendment to the Business Combination Agreement for a proposed merger between Plum Acquisition Corp. IV and Controlled Thermal Resources Holdings Inc. The executing parties modified the merger contract to reduce the aggregate potential earnout shares from 100,000,000 to 70,000,000, dividing them into eight proportional tranches lowered from 12,500,000 to 8,750,000 shares each. Tranche vesting requires the Domesticated Purchaser Common Stock VWAP to meet or exceed $12.50, $15.00, $17.50, $20.00, $22.50, $25.00, $27.50, or $30.00 per share across any 20 trading days within 30 consecutive trading days. Antitrust filing obligations were pushed from July 31, 2026 to September 30, 2026. Maximum shares issuable as non-redemption incentives or sponsor reimbursement rose from 2,000,000 to 3,000,000. The mandatory closing date shifted from December 31, 2026 to April 30, 2027. The valuation benchmark for calculating merger consideration was cut from $4,500,000,000 to $3,150,000,000. Delivery deadlines for material consents were reassigned per Schedule 8.01(m). Registered warrant terms remain set at an $11.50 exercise price for one Class A ordinary share, per the securities table. Why it matters: Lowering the transaction valuation to $3,150,000,000 and trimming 30,000,000 earnout shares fundamentally alters the economic upside and dilution profile for public shareholders versus target owners. Moving the closing window to April 30, 2027 pushes completion past the stated January 16, 2027 business combination deadline, meaning the SPAC must secure a formal extension and preserve the recorded $10.69 trust per share before that date to avoid liquidation. Raising non-redemption shares to 3,000,000 demonstrates active sponsor management of expected redemptions to protect trust capital. Executively, Chief Executive Officer Kanishka Roy and Controlled Thermal Resources President James Turner signed the amendment, which also contains forward-looking assertions about the combined entity’s plan to domesticate in Delaware and advance the Hell’s Kitchen Project, alongside explicitly flagged risks regarding lithium and critical mineral price volatility, development cost overruns, and regulatory environmental compliance. All transactional adjustments and strategic projections are sourced directly to the filed Second BCA Amendment, the accompanying 8-K narrative, and the executive signatories named therein.
outside datenothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Outside date
- not previously extracted2027-04-30
SpacBrain reads this as the agreement may be terminated from 2027-04-30.
The clause …“to the Closing set forth in Article VII have not been satisfied or waived by April 30, 2027 (the “ Outside Date ”); provided, however, the right to terminate this Agreement under this Section 8.01(d) shall not be available to a Party”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
The sponsor
The people who set this company up, what they have done before, and the advisers around the deal.
Deal completion: 1/3 resolved vehicles closed a deal (33%); 2 liquidated, 0 terminated. No measured post-close outcome yet, so completion credit is NOT gated — missing data is never a penalty.
Mixed record · medium confidence
- Finserv Acquisition Corp. II · 2021Liquidated
- Alpha Partners Technology Merger Corp. · 2021Liquidated
Deal team — named in the prospectus
- Cohen & Company Capital MarketsLead-left
- Seaport Global Securities LLCBook-runner
- Benjamin Securities, Inc.Book-runner
Read from this SPAC’s own prospectus; the arrow opens the filing. Firms link to their full mandate record.
The record
The reference detail — how the shares were structured at listing, how thinly they trade, and where the company is registered.
Show the reference detail
Unit structure
That was the figure at listing. It is $10.69 a share today — interest on the account, plus any sponsor payments made to extend the deadline, spread over the shares that never cashed out.
from 424B4 0001213900-25-003871
as of 10 September 2026
Trading & liquidity
Thin book — limit orders only; a position can be hard to exit outside a redemption window.
Company profile
DEAL: Controlled Thermal Resources
Directors & officers
- Steven HandwerkerChief Financial Officer and Director
- Aghamiri AidinDirector
- Roy KanishkaChairman and Chief Executive Officer
- Sahai AvanishDirector
- Gandhi AnjaiDirector
- Chou AllanDirector
Institutional holders
from SC 13G/13DFunds that have declared a stake above 5%. Heavy ownership by arbitrage funds usually means heavy cash-outs at the next vote.
Show the declared stakes
8 filers with a stake on file · 5 re-affirmed in the last 12 months. A stake with no amendment since is the filer’s last word on it, not proof it is still held — and percentages filed in different years are percentages of different floats, because this vehicle’s share count collapses at every redemption.
- PLUM PARTNERS IV, LLC27.6% · SC 13GMar 28, 2025 stale
- Linden Capital L.P.6.5% · SC 13GJul 17, 2026 fresh
- Context Capital Management, LLC5.6% · SC 13GJul 21, 2026 fresh
- METEORA CAPITAL, LLC5.3% · SC 13G/AAug 14, 2026 fresh
- Westchester Capital Management, LLC5.0% · SC 13G/AMay 15, 2026 fresh
- AQR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC4.0% · SC 13G/AAug 12, 2026 fresh
- BARCLAYS PLC3.5% · SC 13G/AAug 12, 2025 stale
- HEALTHCARE OF ONTARIO PENSION PLAN TRUST FUND0.0% · SC 13G/AAug 13, 2025 stale
One line per filer, not per reporting person: a joint schedule names the management company, its funds and often the individual who controls them, and all of them report the same shares. Click a name for that filer’s whole footprint across every SPAC it has declared a stake in.
News
company wires and the financial pressReporting we have matched to this ticker. Headlines belong to the outlets that wrote them.
Show the headlines
No company wire release or press report about this ticker has reached us.
6 social posts mention this ticker — unverified retail chatter, not reporting
- Plum Acquisition Corp. IV (PLMK) Latest Press Releases - Seeking Alpha — Seeking Alpha
- Energias Renovables Argentina (@energiasrenovablesargentina) — instagram.com
- SPAC Track (@spactrack) / Posts / X - Twitter — X
- 3 Key Topics in Initial Business Sales Conversations | Danny Coello ... — linkedin.com
- Jamie Tosh buys 20,000 shares in Delta Gold Tech - LinkedIn — linkedin.com
- Plum Acquisition Corp. IV (PLMK) - Yahoo Finance — Yahoo Finance
Sources on file
harvested pages, kept in fullEvery public page we have read about this company, stored in full so a source can never go missing.
Show the sources
38 full SEC filing texts archived — searchable, never lost.
- Vault note — PLMK (Plum IV)
vault-note · /vault/tickers/PLMK
- Vault deal note — Controlled Thermal Resources (PLMK)
vault-note · /vault/deals/controlled-thermal-resources
Listed peers
Market data 2026-08-19Who this business is like, and what the market pays for them.
Market data as of 2026-08-19 (22 days old). A forward multiple is a market opinion on one day, not a filed figure.
Selected from a listed universe by sector and by business description — not from the SPAC's stated mandate. 8 hand-picked comp(s) are kept alongside and were not rewritten.
8.3x forward EV/Sales — median of n=5 of 11 selected peers (6 publish none), Market data as of 2026-08-19. 6 of the 11 counted comparables publish no forward EV/Sales and are excluded from the median rather than entered as zero (LAC, FEAM, TMC, CRML, SDST, IPO-GLDO). Adjacent comps are never counted.
Operational · 7 — the same sector on a weaker description match, or a neighbouring sector on a strong one
- FEAM 5E Advanced Materials, Inc.$70m · — fwd EV/Sales · sim 0.10
Operational comp: Specialty Mining & Metals (NEC); micro-cap ($70m); shares lithium, filed, project, extraction, mineral, stage with the target's own description; no forward EV/Sales published — counted as a peer, excluded from the median.
- ATLX Atlas Lithium Corp$112m · 729.3× fwd EV/Sales · sim 0.10
Operational comp: Specialty Mining & Metals (NEC); micro-cap ($112m); shares lithium, project, minerals, mineral, critical, located with the target's own description; forward EV/Sales 729.3x.
- LAR Lithium Argentina AG$906m · 3.5× fwd EV/Sales · sim 0.09
Operational comp: Specialty Mining & Metals (NEC); small-cap ($906m); shares lithium, project, mineral, located, operation, used with the target's own description; forward EV/Sales 3.5x.
- ABAT American Battery Technology Company$158m · 14.6× fwd EV/Sales · sim 0.09
Operational comp: Specialty Mining & Metals (NEC); micro-cap ($158m); shares lithium, extraction, from, development, integrated, two with the target's own description; forward EV/Sales 14.6x.
- CRML Critical Metals Corp$376m · — fwd EV/Sales · sim 0.09
Operational comp: Specialty Mining & Metals (NEC); small-cap ($376m); shares lithium, project, minerals, critical, located, development with the target's own description; no forward EV/Sales published — counted as a peer, excluded from the median.
- SDST Stardust Power Inc$30m · — fwd EV/Sales · sim 0.09
Operational comp: Specialty Mining & Metals (NEC); micro-cap ($30m); shares lithium, power, scale, equipment, from, processing with the target's own description; no forward EV/Sales published — counted as a peer, excluded from the median.
- IPO-GLDO Gold Standard Mining Co— · — fwd EV/Sales · sim 0.07
Operational comp: Non-Gold Precious Metals & Minerals (NEC); shares revenue, not, but, stage, any, development with the target's own description; no forward EV/Sales published — counted as a peer, excluded from the median.
Hand-picked · 8 — written by hand before the engine existed, and kept: no engine has overwritten a curated comp
- LAC Lithium Americas Corp$1.3bn · — fwd EV/Sales
Lithium Americas is a pre-revenue US lithium developer constructing a single multi-billion-dollar first-of-a-kind project underwritten by an automaker and federal support - the same single-asset, capital-intensive, permit-driven equity story as Hell's Kitchen.
- MOS Mosaic Co$7.6bn · 1.0× fwd EV/Sales
Mosaic is the deck's own potash comparable and prices the ~3.0 Mtpa potash by-product stream, but it is a mature multi-billion-revenue fertiliser producer and shares neither CTR's stage nor its scale.
- ORA Ormat Technologies Inc$6.7bn · 8.3× fwd EV/Sales
Ormat is the only listed pure-play geothermal power producer and operates plants in the same Imperial Valley resource, making it the direct benchmark for the ~650 MW baseload half of CTR - though it is profitable and in operation, so it brackets the destination rather than the stage.
- PLL PLL— · — fwd EV/Sales
Piedmont Lithium is a US-domiciled lithium developer of comparable market size financing itself on offtake agreements and strategic investment rather than operating cash flow, matching CTR's funding model.
- SGML Sigma Lithium Corporation$1.5bn · 5.2× fwd EV/Sales
Sigma Lithium is a deck-named lithium comparable that has crossed from development into production at a similar single-asset scale, giving the clearest read on the re-rating CTR is underwriting.
- SLI Standard Lithium Ltd.— · — fwd EV/Sales
Standard Lithium is the closest listed analogue - a pre-revenue direct-lithium-extraction developer taking brine to battery-grade product through a first commercial-scale plant with a strategic partner, at the same permit-and-finance stage CTR is at; CTR's own deck names it as a comparable.
- TMC TMC the metals company Inc.$2.6bn · — fwd EV/Sales
TMC is a pre-revenue polymetallic critical-minerals developer sitting on a very large resource with no production and a valuation driven entirely by permitting and policy tailwinds - the closest analogue for CTR's zinc/manganese/polymetallics stream; CTR's deck uses it as a comp.
- UUUU Energy Fuels Inc— · — fwd EV/Sales
Energy Fuels is a deck-named US critical-minerals and rare-earth processor benefiting from the same domestic-supply-chain policy push, but it already produces and sells material, so it is a policy-thesis comp rather than a stage-matched peer.
Cash in trust over time
XBRL, per filingHow much cash has stood behind each share at each filing date.
Show the filed values
- 30 June 2026$10.69
- 30 June 2026—
- 31 March 2026—
- 31 March 2026$10.59
In plain English
tap a term to open itEvery piece of jargon this page could have used, and what it actually means.
Open the plain-English guide
No floor / floorlessthe cash guarantee is gone — the price is unprotected
A SPAC's downside protection is not the cash in trust; it is your right to demand that cash. Once the redemption window closes, the cash stays with the company and the share can trade anywhere.
Redemption deadlinethe last day to hand shares back for cash
Set by the filing that calls the meeting. Tender after it and the company is under no obligation to pay you the trust value.
Broker action datethe day your broker needs the instruction — earlier than the official date
Brokers batch redemption instructions to the transfer agent, so the practical cutoff is roughly two business days before the published deadline. This is the date that actually costs people the floor.
Cash in trust / trust per sharethe cash the company is holding for each public share
Filed quarterly in the 10-Q's XBRL. It earns interest between filings, so the figure on a given day is slightly higher than the last filed one — where we show that we label it an estimate.
Trust discountbuying below the cash held for you
Only meaningful while a redemption right exists. On a floorless name the same arithmetic is not a discount, it is the market pricing distress, and this product will not call it a yield.
Dilutionhow much of the company new shares take from you
Sponsor promote, PIPE shares, warrants and rights all issue stock that did not pay $10 for it. The headline deal value is before that; the effective value is after.
Pro-forma equitywhat the company is valued at once the deal closes
The combined company's equity value assuming the announced terms and the redemptions that have actually happened.
ARShow much upside you get per unit of downside
SpacBrain's asymmetric-return score. It is deterministic — the same inputs always produce the same number — and it is capped, not zeroed, when the floor is gone.
De-SPACthe day the SPAC becomes the real company
The shares stop being a claim on a pot of cash and start being equity in an operating business. Roughly 80% of recent de-SPACs traded below $10 within a year.
Outside datethe contractual long-stop for closing the deal
A deadline between the SPAC and its target, not between the SPAC and you. It confers no right to cash, which is exactly why it must never be counted as a redemption window.
Accession numberthe SEC's unique id for one filing
Every figure on this page carries the accession of the filing that states it, so you can open the primary document rather than trust us.
Accreted NAV (estimate)the last filed cash figure, plus the interest it should have earned since
A model, not a filing: last filed value compounded at the 3-month T-bill for the days elapsed. Always shown in italic with the word estimate, and never printed beside a filed number without it.
Ask the brain
from its filingsData provenance & audit trail17 internal entries
Written by SpacBrain’s data agents whenever a figure is captured, corrected or flagged, and kept verbatim so every number on this page can be traced back to the filing that states it. This is a running log, not the current record: an early entry may be superseded by a later correction — the panels above always hold the current values.
Deadline 2027-01-16 (board monthly opts to 2027-07-16) per 8-K 0001213900-26-078728 (filed; replaces 2027-04-29).
ipoSizeM NULL->172.5: 17,250,000 units incl. 2,250,000 over-allotment units (full exercise) (acc 0001213900-25-004228)
sponsor "PLUM PARTNERS IV, LLC" (SEC CIK 0002047679) sourced from Form 3 reportingOwner (10% owner) acc 0001213900-25-003580.
trust/share $10.59 from 10-Q acc 0001213900-26-057797 as of 2026-03-31
warrantStrike=11.5, warrantCallPrice=18, unitSeparationDays=52 from the definitive prospectus (0001213900-25-003871). NOT FILLED: rightShareRatio — no stated candidate
announcedAt=2026-03-08 from Business Combination Agreement with Controlled Thermal Resources Holdings Inc. (8-K Item 1.01, event 2026-03-08, acc 0001213900-26-026265). NOTE: the 2025-12-19 press release (8-K 7.01, acc 0001213900-25-123850) was only a NON-BINDING LOI, not the definitive agreement.
BC vote not yet scheduled as of 2026-08-13 (no merger proxy on EDGAR).
old=4700 new=4500 basis=equity at close (pre-money equity value) acc=0001213900-26-024933 — the prior 4700 was a pro-forma ENTERPRISE value: press release (425 acc 0001213900-26-024933, ex99-1) "Transaction values Controlled Thermal Resources at a pro forma enterprise value of approximately $4.7 billion." The equity figure IS stated, in the investor presentation filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the same 425: "CTR pre-money equity value of $4.5B" and "Transaction implies ~$4.7B pro-forma enterprise value". Post-money figures documented, not used as the headline: deck Pro-Forma Valuation shows 496.6M shares outstanding at a $10.00 share price = $4,966M Equity Value, less $285M PF net cash = $4,681M Enterprise Value; Total Sources/Uses $4,805M. Contingent consideration excluded from the headline: earnout of up to 100,000,000 shares over ten years. This corrects the §E flag that "the filings do not state an equity value" — they do, in the Exhibit 99.2 deck.
Primary-source deal structure (0001213900-26-026268, 0001213900-26-024935). effectiveEquityM left null: assumed refPrice $10.00; public shares counted pre-redemption — actual dilution falls with redemptions; promotePct unknown → founder promote excluded (effective equity understated) [bottom-up] FLAGS: Press release states a pro forma ENTERPRISE value of approximately $4.7 billion — enterprise, not equity, so DB headline left null
effective equity $4730M vs headline $4500M (+5.1%) [bottom-up, medium] from already-stored primary figures: target-consideration=450M sh/$4500M, public-shares=17.3M sh/$172.5M, founder-promote=5.8M sh/$57.5M — assumed refPrice $10.00; public shares counted pre-redemption — actual dilution falls with redemptions
valueUsdM 4500 -> 3150: Second BCA Amendment dated 2026-07-06 (acc 0001213900-26-077224 / -077229) cut the merger consideration from $4,500,000,000 to $3,150,000,000 (-30%), cut earnout shares 100M -> 70M, and pushed the outside date 2026-12-31 -> 2027-04-30. The stored 4500 was the original signing headline; every multiple struck on it ran 43% too high.
expected close as filed: "ext. Jan 2027" — not a period the filing stated; stored NULL.
expected close as filed: "second half of 2026" — typed as H2 2026; the remainder is attribution, not a stated close.
ENERGY -> BATTERY, on 425 0001213900-26-091868: "CTR produces clean, 24/7 baseload geothermal power and recovers battery - grade lithium and critical minerals from the same superheated brine, in a single co - "
pipeBasis set to UNSOURCED: the size came from the research seed / an earlier record and no filing we hold states it — surfaces now label it "unsourced"; an LLM re-read to FILED replaces this when credits allow
Held 2026-07-10: Termination Date 2026-07-16 -> 2027-01-16, board monthly opts (6x) to 2027-07-16.
8-K acc 0001213900-26-078728 states the date. The 18-month-from-2025-01-16 arithmetic gives 2026-07-16 instead; the filing's own words are used (reviewed individually 2026-08-14). Extension mechanism: automatic (sponsor may extend without a further vote), from the filings: "ted by Plum Partners IV, LLC (the " Sponsor ") and upon five days' advance notice prior to the applicable Termination Date, until July 16, 2027, or a total of up to twelve months after the Termination Date, unless the closing of a business combination shall have occurred prior to such date (the " Extension Amendment Proposal ")." Spac.deadline currently reads 2027-01-15 — not changed by this job.