Loading
Distinct shells carrying a filed role for this person — not every shell they have ever touched.
SEC-verified vehicles of the same sponsor, predating these roles and carrying none of them. The badge counts them; the figure beside this one does not.
Mergers closed across all 3 — these vehicles and the franchise's earlier ones together.
Announced but not closed, and still hunting — again over all 3.
No closed vehicle here has both a stored price and a filed trust value to score it against.
2 vehicles on file, newest listing first
5 of 10 appear on more than one
3 people on two or more of them
Ryan Lee Wen is the director of RF Acquisition Corp II. Other key executives at RF Acquisition Corp II include director & 10 percent owner & CEO and Chairman ...
Ryan Lee Wen has served as an independent director of the company since September 2025 and has served as a director of RF Acquisition Corp II since February 2024. He has been a Director at Avatar Capital, a Singapore Capital Markets Services licensed financial institution, since February 2024, and a Venture Partner at Artichoke Capital, a web3 venture capital firm, since January 2022. Previously, from April 2019 to January 2022, he was responsible for corporate and business development at Transmedic, the largest medical device distributor across the ASEAN region, and he began his career as an investment banking analyst at Deutsche Bank from July 2018 to April 2019. He is an operator and investor with experience across the medical, finance, consumer, and blockchain industries.
[Origin not recorded. Carried over from /people/wen-ryan-lee-3011, a second record for the same person.]
This record is keyed to SEC CIK 0002013011 — the identifier this person files under in their own name. Every vehicle above is a filing made under that CIK, so “the same person on two shells” is a fact about an SEC identifier rather than about a name that happens to match.
Roles are the strings the filings used, in the order they were filed. Nothing on this page ranks them, infers seniority, or offers a reason why any two of these names recur — a recurrence is a count, and the filings that produced it are linked beside every row. We also hold 24 institutional-holder rows on these vehicles, under 13 distinct name strings, and none of them is counted across vehicles: that table has no CIK column, and matching holders by name would merge firms that are not the same firm.