Sentinel Energy Services Inc.
STNL · Nasdaq
NO ACTION REQUIRED
Nothing left to do
The cash went back to shareholders and the company wound up. There is no deadline left to miss.
Cash at settlement
No cash-per-share figure was filed for this vehicle before it finished.
Last close
Daily close
No price history on file yet — daily closes accumulate from the market data feed.
Trust settled · There is no line to draw here. This vehicle has finished: the cash was paid back or spent closing the deal, so the last filed figure describes an account that no longer exists and would be a floor under nothing.
SpacBrain’s read
Trust settled
The trust was liquidated and paid back to holders pro rata — the floor was honoured and the SPAC has wound up, so there is nothing left to claim.
In plain terms
- What it is
- A SPAC from Sentinel Management Holdings, LLC, listed on Nasdaq in November 2017.
- What it's doing now
- It never completed a purchase. The company wound up and the cash in the account went back to shareholders — the ordinary ending when a SPAC runs out of time. No agreed deal for it is on file with us, so we cannot say whether one was ever announced and later fell through.
- What you should know
- This SPAC has finished. The cash was paid back to shareholders and the company wound up, so there is nothing left to claim — the money went where the charter said it would.
At a glance
- Where it stands
- Liquidated
- Deal
- none — it wound up and returned the cash instead
- Industry
- no filing we hold states a sector this SPAC restricted its search to
- Deal value
- no deal to value — it wound up instead
- Price vs cash at settlement
- no live price on file
- Cash in trust when it settled
- not yet extracted into a snapshot — the filings below may state it
- the last trust total filed while this was still a SPAC — the account has since been paid out or used to close the deal
- IPO
- 6 November 2017
- size not on file · 100.0% of each $10 unit into trust
- Headquarters
- 700 LOUISIANA STREET, HOUSTON, TX, 77002
- registered in Delaware
- Lead underwriter
- not extracted from the prospectus yet
- Key officers
- Leykum Charles S. (Director)
- Listed securities
- STNL common
This vehicle has finished, so there is no window to file a cash-per-share figure for and none will follow. No estimate is shown in its place.
Nothing dated is on file. That is an absence in the record, not a statement that nothing is coming.
Yield to redemption
Nothing left to redeem — no yield to compute.
This SPAC has finished — its trust was paid back or used to close the deal, so there is nothing left to redeem and no yield to compute. A yield to redemption is a claim that you can hand these shares back for the trust cash. That account is closed, so this page will not print a number here.
What happened to the cash
The reasoning behind the verdict above, in the order the filings establish it.
- The trust was liquidated and paid back to holders pro rata — the floor was honoured and the SPAC has wound up, so there is nothing left to claim.
What has happened, and what is coming
1 dated milestoneEvery dated step from the day it listed to the next date you may have to act on. Where you have to do something, the day your broker needs the instruction is marked too.
- 6 November 2017IPOpassed
IPO size not on file
The score
deterministic, from filed fieldsSTNL is not in the scored universe, so no score is shown. A withheld score is a fact about the record, not a verdict about the company.
The score is only published for names that carry both a price and a filed cash-per-share figure — 292 of the tracked fleet today. The rest keep an empty dial rather than a modelled one, and fill in by themselves as the fields land.
The company
from SEC filingsRead the full profile
Sentinel Energy Services Inc. (Nasdaq: STNL) was a blank-check company whose IPO was priced on November 6, 2017, per 424B prospectus 0001213900-17-011364. The company's SEC CIK is 0001709768 and its SEC SIC industry code is 6770 (Blank Checks). The common ticker STNL is printed on the cover page of 8-K 0001213900-19-022154, filed November 6, 2019. Sentinel Energy Services Inc. liquidated and returned trust cash to shareholders, with the redemption established by Form 25 0001354457-19-000584 filed November 7, 2019, under 17 CFR 240.12d2-2(a)(4) for the Class A Common Stock, Unit, and Warrant.
Material findings
from the full read of every filingEvery document this company files gets read whole — body and exhibits. These are the ones the read flagged as material, newest first, each citing its filing.
Two directors leaving at once at a SPAC that no longer has a listed security is a wind-down signal rather than a governance refresh. The 'no disagreement' language is the standard Item 5.02 formula and carries no further information. The report names no replacements, no committee consequences, no trust figure and no deadline, so nothing here says what the remaining board intends to do.
Going concern is stated and then explicitly alleviated by the sponsor rather than by the company: management says it does not have sufficient liquidity to meet future obligations but has access to Sponsor funds, having received about $1,830,000 during the quarter against a working capital deficit of about $399,000 and cash of about $273,000. One internal contradiction to check: the per-share note computes the loss as $46,713 while the statement of operations reports $46,173. Nothing here was written to a status, trust or price field.
The registrant survives its own trust: it reports insufficient liquidity to meet future obligations, a working capital deficit of about $5.7 million, roughly $160,000 of cash, $3,379,283 owed to the Sponsor at year end plus about $1,800,000 more advanced through March 16, 2020, which the Sponsor intends to convert to equity. Cover states no Class A and 862,500 Class B outstanding at March 16, 2020. Detect-only: the approximately $10.30 redemption price and the November 7, 2019 date are quoted as filed; nothing was written to a status, trust or price field.
Two directors leave ten days after the warrantholder vote that converted the public warrants into a $0.02 cash claim, on a company that has already redeemed all of its public shares and is winding down. The filing includes the express no-disagreement statement, which is the disclosure that would otherwise be required if the departures involved one.
The public warrants are now contractually converted into a $0.02 cash claim rather than an equity right, so the wind-down's final security is settled: the alternative stated in the proxy was expiry at zero on dissolution. The vote was not lopsided — 2,257,847 against and 126,936 abstaining out of 8,358,845 warrants voted, roughly 28% not in favour — but the amendment binds every public warrant whether or not its holder voted for it. The payment date is left to the company's sole discretion, so the timing of the $0.02 is not fixed by this filing.
This is the mailed and voted version, so December 9, 2019 is the date on which the public warrants either receive $0.02 each or, if the amendment fails and the company dissolves, nothing. The public shares are already redeemed; this meeting concerns only the residual security. The company's stated reason for failing — sector conditions over the search period — is on the record in the definitive materials.
Show 24 more material filings
The balance sheet at the quarter end shows a shell carrying $4.7 million of payables and a $999,640 sponsor note against $180,013 of cash — the accumulated cost of a search that did not produce a transaction, all of it ranking outside the trust. Redemption value is carried at approximately $10.00 per share here even though the trust held $356,228,094 against 34,500,000 public shares, roughly $10.32; the $12,075,000 deferred underwriting fee is payable only on a closing that will not occur.
This is the wind-down's second act and it concerns the security the liquidation left with nothing: the public shares were already redeemed, and the only remaining question is whether the 11,500,000 public warrants get $0.02 each or zero. The sponsor's forfeiture of all 5,933,333 private warrants and 90% of its founder shares for no consideration is what makes the payment possible without touching the redeemed trust. The 50% threshold is of outstanding warrants, so non-votes count against, and the meeting date is still blank in this preliminary version.
The extension vote that the October 25 definitive proxy was mailed for never happened: the board withdrew the proposal on the day of the meeting and went to the charter's default instead, redeeming 100% of the public shares at the November 7 deadline. That is the outcome the proxy described as the consequence of the amendment not passing, reached without a vote. The $354,471,990 trust and approximately $10.27 estimated per-share amount in that proxy are the terms on which the public shares are being redeemed; warrants, as the proxy stated, receive nothing.
The operative extension being voted on runs to May 31, 2020. The August 31, 2020 date is conditional — it exists only if a definitive agreement or binding term sheet is executed by May 31, 2020 — so it is a ceiling contingent on a deal being signed, not a deadline the company holds. This is the version that is mailed and voted, so November 6 and the November 7 charter deadline are now fixed; the earlier preliminary filing offered only the single May 31, 2020 date.
The approval bar here is a 65% supermajority of all outstanding common stock, not a simple majority, so abstentions and non-votes count against — a materially harder gate than the majority standard used by many extension votes. The trust stood at $354,471,990 at June 30, 2019 and the estimated $10.27 redemption price sits just below the $10.30 market price, so a holder redeeming gives up roughly three cents against the last close. The filing is explicit that warrants receive nothing on a wind-up.
Payables of $6 million and a working-capital deficit of $6.4 million more than four months after the Strike deal terminated — the unpaid costs of the failed transaction are still accruing on a SPAC with no new target.
Current liabilities of $4.36 million against under $1 million of cash: nearly $1 million of the sponsor's $1.5 million facility is already drawn, and the terminated deal's unpaid costs are still sitting on the balance sheet.
Cash outside the trust is $145,699 against $2.82 million of current liabilities — a working-capital deficit of more than $2.6 million after the terminated deal, met only by sponsor credit maturing November 7, 2019.
Sponsor funding of up to $1.5 million with a hard November 7, 2019 maturity, taken out three weeks after the Strike transaction terminated — the SPAC is now running its search on sponsor credit with a dated repayment obligation.
The Strike transaction is over by mutual agreement, and the termination pulls down the whole financing package with it — the PIPE subscriptions from CSL and Fidelity and the sponsor voting agreement all fall away automatically, leaving the trust intact and the SPAC searching again.
A definitive proxy had been mailed and the meeting was pulled the day before it was to be held, with no replacement date — the transaction's timeline stopped here rather than slipped.
The vote scheduled for the next day was pulled with no new date given and no reason stated — ten days after the company had told Nasdaq it expected to close on or around February 6.
Formal notice to the incumbent exchange of an intended venue change conditioned on the combination closing — a step taken only when a closing is treated as imminent.
States an expected closing date of on or around February 6, 2019 and the post-closing ticker — the clearest timing statement the company made about this transaction.
This is an Up-C: the Continuing Members keep their Strike units and receive one share of StrikeCo Class B common stock for each unit retained, exchangeable later into Class A under an Exchange Agreement, so public holders are diluted progressively by exchanges rather than once at closing. Authorised capital rises from 221,000,000 shares to 451,000,000, comprising 400,000,000 Class A, 50,000,000 Class B and 1,000,000 preferred. Private placements to CSL Energy and to Fidelity-managed funds sit inside the same stock issuance proposal.
It states the completion deadline as a DATE rather than a term of months - the company has until November 7, 2019 to complete a business combination, failing which it winds up and redeems the public shares within ten business days. That is the fact a holder acts on, and a document filed under a form usually treated as routine registration paperwork is where it is written down. The warrant call also survives the domestication in its Cayman form: $0.01 per warrant if the reported CLOSING price is at least $18.00 for 20 of 30 trading days ending three business days before notice.
Nothing about a target or a merger is registered here — this is purely a change of incorporation, so there is no consideration, no exchange ratio and no target-side approval. Every security converts one-for-one, so the domestication is economically neutral to holders: no one is diluted by the step itself. What does change is the governing law, from Cayman to Delaware, which alters shareholder remedies, appraisal rights and fiduciary standards for everything that follows.
The numbers a holder needs are stated: $348,956,985 held in trust at September 30, 2018, a redemption price of approximately $10.12 per public share on that date, and an outside date of November 7, 2019 after which Sentinel would wind up and liquidate the trust. The fee table values the transaction at $431,269,468 including $124,400,000 of estimated cash consideration. The proxy warns explicitly that a bankruptcy filing before distribution could put creditors ahead of stockholders and take the per-share amount below $10.00.
Prices Sentinel's own securities for registration purposes on November 6, 2018 — units at $10.45 and shares at $10.03 — and sets out the domestication mechanic under which every existing holder's security converts one-for-one into a Delaware security. The extracted text is the cover and fee table; the proxy statement/prospectus body is not covered here.
A delisting process opened and closed inside four days by reconstituting the board — and the new directors' terms are written to end at the Strike closing, tying the fix explicitly to the pending deal.
Expenses and accrued payables rose roughly ninefold in the quarter the Strike Capital transaction agreement was signed, while cash outside the trust fell to about $555,000 — deal costs accruing faster than the working capital available to pay them.
Puts the signed transaction agreement into the proxy-solicitation record ahead of the Sentinel shareholder vote. The extracted text is the agreement's table of contents and recitals, not the purchase price.
The explicit requirement to contribute all remaining cash to Strike and condition closing on cash sufficiency for the approximately $124.4 million payment directly impacts trust preservation and redemption calculus, as deploying funds accelerates the depletion of distributable balances ahead of the February 13, 2019 hard deadline. Absent an extension mechanism in this filing, missing the termination date triggers dissolution risk, heightening redemption urgency. The Sponsor’s contractual waiver of warrant/equity upside and the locked ~20% voting bloc reduce future dilution but anchor early-holder alignment to deal approval. The $132.0 million PIPE at $10.00 per share supplies liquidity for the cash portion while attaching aggressive financial penalties (0.5% monthly, 5.0% cap) for registration delays that would stall public float liquidity and increase lock-up duration. Regarding substantive business developments, the filing establishes a partnership strategy where Strike operates as the core managing entity under an Up-C structure, integrating assets from Pipelogic Services L.L.C. and Invacor Pipeline and Process Solutions, LLC. CSL Energy is identified as an energy services-focused private equity fund, and personnel/governance shifts anticipate appointing Strike designees to the board while converting public ordinary shares to Delaware common stock. These mechanical commitments and structural realignments dictate capital deployment speed, shareholder exit windows, and the economic trajectory of the combined pipeline processing and energy services platform without introducing undisclosed customer concentrations, revenue projections, or litigation exposures in this disclosure.
Trust income of roughly $1.35 million a quarter is now accruing on a trust funded at $10.00 per share, while operating cash outside it has fallen by a third since December.
Showing the 30 most recent of 36 filings flagged material — the full feed is in Filings below.
Filings
live EDGAR feedEverything this company has filed with the SEC recently, newest first, each with a plain summary of what changed and why it matters.
going-concern doubtnothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
The clause …“Resources” above. The Company demonstrates adverse conditions that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for one year following the issuance of these financial statements. These adverse”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
going-concern doubtnothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
The clause …“Agreement” in Note 4. The Company demonstrates adverse conditions that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for one year following the issuance of these financial statements. These adverse”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
Show the other 10 filings
going-concern doubtnothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
The clause “TATEMENTS MARCH 31, 2023 The Company demonstrates adverse conditions that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for one year following the issuance of these financial statements. These adverse”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
going-concern doubtnothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
The clause …“of the assets in the Trust Account on November 8, 2019. This raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1 to the”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
going-concern doubtnothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
The clause “SED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Company demonstrates adverse conditions that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for one year following the issuance of these financial statements. These adverse”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
going-concern doubtnothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
The clause “SED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Company demonstrates adverse conditions that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for one year following the issuance of these financial statements. These adverse”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
The sponsor
The people who set this company up, what they have done before, and the advisers around the deal.
Sentinel Management Holdings, LLCnamed as sponsor in this SPAC’s filings — but with no researched track record behind it yet.
A missing score, not a score of zero — why
A Sponsor Score is only published once the sponsor’s prior vehicles have been verified on EDGAR and their post-close outcomes priced. That record does not exist for this sponsor yet, so no number and no tier is shown. That is a missing score, not a score of zero — and not a neutral 50 either.
Coverage so far: 301 of 1284 tracked SPACs (23%) are attached to a scored sponsor. This card fills in by itself as the research lands.
The record
The reference detail — how the shares were structured at listing, how thinly they trade, and where the company is registered.
Show the reference detail
Unit structure
Unit: U = S + W/3 · 100.0% of the $10 unit
from 424B3 0001213900-18-017206
Trading & liquidity
Company profile
Directors & officers
- Leykum Charles S.Director
Institutional holders
from SC 13G/13DFunds that have declared a stake above 5%. Heavy ownership by arbitrage funds usually means heavy cash-outs at the next vote.
Show the declared stakes
9 filers with a stake on file · 0 re-affirmed in the last 12 months. A stake with no amendment since is the filer’s last word on it, not proof it is still held — and percentages filed in different years are percentages of different floats, because this vehicle’s share count collapses at every redemption.
- CSL Sentinel Holdings, LLCwith 2 other reporting persons on the same schedule19.9% · SC 13GJan 25, 2018 stale
- Encompass Capital Advisors LLCwith 2 other reporting persons on the same schedule5.0% · SC 13GNov 13, 2017 stale
- GLAZER CAPITAL, LLCwith 1 other reporting person on the same schedule0.0% · SC 13G/AFeb 16, 2021 stale
- J. Goldman & Co LPwith 2 other reporting persons on the same schedule0.0% · SC 13G/AFeb 14, 2020 stale
- Governors Lane LPwith 3 other reporting persons on the same schedule0.0% · SC 13G/AFeb 14, 2020 stale
- BlueCrest Capital Management Ltdwith 1 other reporting person on the same schedule0.0% · SC 13G/AFeb 14, 2020 stale
- Polar Asset Management Partners Inc.0.0% · SC 13G/ADec 10, 2019 stale
- BlackRock Inc.0.0% · SC 13G/AJul 10, 2019 stale
- Brenham Capital Management, L.P.with 3 other reporting persons on the same schedule0.0% · SC 13G/AFeb 14, 2019 stale
One line per filer, not per reporting person: a joint schedule names the management company, its funds and often the individual who controls them, and all of them report the same shares. Click a name for that filer’s whole footprint across every SPAC it has declared a stake in.
Sources on file
harvested pages, kept in fullEvery public page we have read about this company, stored in full so a source can never go missing.
Show the sources
39 full SEC filing texts archived — searchable, never lost.
- Vault note — STNL (Sentinel Energy Services Inc.)
vault-note · /vault/tickers/STNL
In plain English
tap a term to open itEvery piece of jargon this page could have used, and what it actually means.
Open the plain-English guide
No floor / floorlessthe cash guarantee is gone — the price is unprotected
A SPAC's downside protection is not the cash in trust; it is your right to demand that cash. Once the redemption window closes, the cash stays with the company and the share can trade anywhere.
Redemption deadlinethe last day to hand shares back for cash
Set by the filing that calls the meeting. Tender after it and the company is under no obligation to pay you the trust value.
Broker action datethe day your broker needs the instruction — earlier than the official date
Brokers batch redemption instructions to the transfer agent, so the practical cutoff is roughly two business days before the published deadline. This is the date that actually costs people the floor.
Cash in trust / trust per sharethe cash the company is holding for each public share
Filed quarterly in the 10-Q's XBRL. It earns interest between filings, so the figure on a given day is slightly higher than the last filed one — where we show that we label it an estimate.
Trust discountbuying below the cash held for you
Only meaningful while a redemption right exists. On a floorless name the same arithmetic is not a discount, it is the market pricing distress, and this product will not call it a yield.
Dilutionhow much of the company new shares take from you
Sponsor promote, PIPE shares, warrants and rights all issue stock that did not pay $10 for it. The headline deal value is before that; the effective value is after.
Pro-forma equitywhat the company is valued at once the deal closes
The combined company's equity value assuming the announced terms and the redemptions that have actually happened.
ARShow much upside you get per unit of downside
SpacBrain's asymmetric-return score. It is deterministic — the same inputs always produce the same number — and it is capped, not zeroed, when the floor is gone.
De-SPACthe day the SPAC becomes the real company
The shares stop being a claim on a pot of cash and start being equity in an operating business. Roughly 80% of recent de-SPACs traded below $10 within a year.
Outside datethe contractual long-stop for closing the deal
A deadline between the SPAC and its target, not between the SPAC and you. It confers no right to cash, which is exactly why it must never be counted as a redemption window.
Accession numberthe SEC's unique id for one filing
Every figure on this page carries the accession of the filing that states it, so you can open the primary document rather than trust us.
Accreted NAV (estimate)the last filed cash figure, plus the interest it should have earned since
A model, not a filing: last filed value compounded at the 3-month T-bill for the days elapsed. Always shown in italic with the word estimate, and never printed beside a filed number without it.
Ask the brain
from its filingsData provenance & audit trail2 internal entries
Written by SpacBrain’s data agents whenever a figure is captured, corrected or flagged, and kept verbatim so every number on this page can be traced back to the filing that states it. This is a running log, not the current record: an early entry may be superseded by a later correction — the panels above always hold the current values.
admitted from the HISTORICAL census (EDGAR's SIC 6770 registrant list, walked in full: 3,325 registrants, 1,167 of which ever priced an IPO). The live discovery job cannot reach this registrant — it reads the filing tape, and this one stopped filing. Admission rule: src/lib/universe-admit.ts. SIC 6770 (Blank Checks); 424B 0001213900-17-011364 priced 2017-11-06; common ticker STNL off 8-K 0001213900-19-022154 (2019-11-06); lifecycle EXITED. Ending PROVEN, not inferred: LIQUIDATED per Form 25 0001354457-19-000584 (2019-11-07) — Form 25 filed under 17 CFR 240.12d2-2(a)(4) — the rule for a class "called for redemption" or "redeemed or paid at maturity/retirement". For a SPAC that class is the public shares and that redemption is the trust going back (class: Class A Common Stock, Unit, and Warrant). No wind-up press release was readable on the registrant's own file, so the per-share figure is not stored.. ipoSizeM and deadline left NULL: gross-proceeds prose conflates the over-allotment with the offering, and a charter deadline belonging to a vehicle that has ended is a date nobody can act on. ipoDate is the 424B pricing date.
sponsor "Sentinel Management Holdings, LLC" sourced from prospectus definition (10-K) acc 0001213900-18-003466.