Distinct shells carrying a filed role for this person — not every shell they have ever touched.
SEC-verified vehicles of the same sponsor, predating these roles and carrying none of them. The badge counts them; the figure beside this one does not.
Mergers closed across all 5 — these vehicles and the franchise's earlier ones together.
Announced but not closed, and still hunting — again over all 5.
No closed vehicle here has both a stored price and a filed trust value to score it against.
1 liquidated — weigh against the wins.
3 vehicles on file, newest listing first
none appears on more than one · 2 vehicles carry no counterparty filing we have read
5 people on two or more of them
Daniel E. Esters , our Chief Financial Officer and director nominee, is the Chief Financial Officer and a Partner of SilverBox Capital, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of SilverBox Securities and has been serving as Chief Financial Officer of SBXD since its initial public offering in August 2024. He formerly served as the Chief Financial Officer of SBXC from February 2023 until its liquidation in November 2024, SBEA until its business combination with BRCC in February 2022 and Boxwood Merger Corp. from November 2018 to February 2020. Mr. Esters spent 24 years serving in a variety of capacities at several investment banking firms where he accumulated extensive transaction experience including origination, due diligence assessment, structuring, negotiation and marketing of a wide range of merger and acquisitions, debt financings, restructurings and public equity offerings. From August 2014 to September 2018, Mr. Esters served as a managing director of M&A Capital LLC, a boutique investment banking firm and independent sponsor.
This record is keyed to SEC CIK 0001759043 — the identifier this person files under in their own name. Every vehicle above is a filing made under that CIK, so “the same person on two shells” is a fact about an SEC identifier rather than about a name that happens to match.
Roles are the strings the filings used, in the order they were filed. Nothing on this page ranks them, infers seniority, or offers a reason why any two of these names recur — a recurrence is a count, and the filings that produced it are linked beside every row. We also hold 57 institutional-holder rows on these vehicles, under 30 distinct name strings, and none of them is counted across vehicles: that table has no CIK column, and matching holders by name would merge firms that are not the same firm.