OAKU SEC filings, in plain English
Everything Oak Woods Acquisition Corp has filed with the SEC that we hold — 40 filings, newest first, 4 with a plain-English summary of what changed and why it matters. Every row links to the primary document on EDGAR, so you can check the source rather than trust us.
The feed
live EDGAR captureNew filings appear here within minutes of hitting EDGAR; summaries follow once the pipeline has read them.
What changed: Oak Woods Acquisition Corporation reported that at the extraordinary general meeting on July 8, 2026 shareholders approved the Charter Amendment Proposal, extending the deadline to complete a business combination from March 28, 2026 to March 28, 2027 and making the resolution retroactively effective as of the original outside date. As of the June 16, 2026 record date there were 3,083,606 ordinary shares entitled to vote. The proposal needed a two-thirds special resolution under Cayman law and passed 2,398,953 to 208,150 with no abstentions. The Adjournment Proposal also passed. Why it matters: The retroactive effect is the operative detail: the vehicle had been operating past its own charter deadline since March 28, 2026 without liquidating, and this vote cures that gap and buys a full further year to March 28, 2027. For holders of the remaining public shares the trust redemption right survives on a stated basis of roughly $12.62 per share, but the runway is now measured in another twelve months of extension costs. Opposition was 8% of votes cast, so support was not close.
outside datenothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Outside date
- 2027-03-28 · unchanged
The clause …“Company has to complete a business combination from March 28, 2026 (“Current Outside Date”) to March 28, 2027, and that such resolution be made retroactively effective as of the Current Outside Date (the “Charter Amendment Proposal”).”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
What changed: Oak Woods Acquisition Corporation set an extraordinary general meeting for July 8, 2026 at 12:00 p.m. ET, record date June 16, 2026, to amend its charter and extend the business combination deadline past the March 28, 2026 outside date, which it passed without effectuating the liquidating redemption or starting Cayman liquidation. Prior extensions required monthly trust deposits of $42,998.37. At the record date trust held about $16,446,537.85, roughly $12.62 per share. Shares were delisted from Nasdaq on March 23, 2026 and trade over the counter. Why it matters: The trust floor is intact at roughly $12.62 per share and continues to accrue, so redeeming holders are still paid out well above the $10.00 IPO price, but the SPAC is operating past its own outside date without having redeemed, which is a governance failure that leaves shareholders relying on the board rather than the charter. The March 23, 2026 Nasdaq delisting removes exchange liquidity and forces OTC trading, typically at a discount to trust, and it also disqualifies the vehicle from many deal structures, narrowing the chance of any combination completing before liquidation.
What changed vs 2025-09-25trust $43.2M → $16.4M -62%deadline 2026-03-28 → 2027-09-28trust account, combination deadline, mandate language +12 moved · 2 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $43.2M$16.4M
- Combination deadline
- 2026-03-282027-09-28
- Mandate language
- not previously extractedwe intend to pursue our initial business combination with on…
- Outside date
- 2027-03-28 · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $26,742,847 left the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“that the per -share price at which public shares may be redeemed from cash held in the Trust Account will be approximately $16,446,537.85 at the time of the Extraordinary General Meeting. The closing price of one Class A Ordinary”…
SpacBrain reads this as 549 days later than the previous record.
The clause …“other things: • If the Extension is not approved and we do not consummate a business combination by September 28, 2027, the 637,500 Class B and 343,125 Class A private Ordinary Shares held by the Sponsor will be worthless (as the”…
The clause …“combination (a “business combination”) from March 28, 2026 (the “Current Outside Date”) to March 28, 2027 (the “Extended Date”) and that such resolution be made retroactively effective as of the Current Outside Date” ☐ ☐ ☐ FOR”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
What changed: Oak Woods Acquisition Corporation, a Cayman Islands exempted company, filed a preliminary proxy for an extraordinary general meeting at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time on a May date left as a bracketed blank, conducted exclusively by live webcast; the record date is May 12, 2026. Two proposals: a Charter Amendment, by special resolution, extending the date by which the company must consummate a business combination from March 28, 2026, the Current Outside Date, to March 28, 2027, that resolution to be made retroactively effective as of the Current Outside Date; and adjournment. Why it matters: The Current Outside Date had ALREADY PASSED when this was filed — which is why the amendment is drafted to operate retroactively. So no date binds in the ordinary sense; what the vote would do is reach back and revive a deadline that had expired. Nothing here can be written into a deadline column from the proxy alone, because the operative fact is the outcome, which lives in a later filing. The charter had reached March 28, 2026 by monthly extension fees deposited into the trust account of $29,968.56 each.
outside date1 moved
- Outside date
- 2026-03-282027-03-28
SpacBrain reads this as 365 days later than the previous record.
The clause …“combination (a “business combination”) from March 28, 2026 (the “Current Outside Date”) to March 28, 2027 (the “Extended Date”) and that such resolution be made retroactively effective as of the Current Outside Date” ☐ ☐ ☐ FOR”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2026-01-08trust $42.4M → $43.3M +2%
trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt +11 moved · 3 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $42.4M$43.3M
- Combination deadline
- 2026-09-28 · unchanged
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Redeemable shares
- 3.58M · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $958,129 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause “637 Other current assets 24,012 — Total Current Assets 25,942 4,637 Investments held in the Trust Account 43,319,176 48,084,367 Cash in transit to Trust Account — 345,000 Total Assets $ 43,345,118 $ 48,434,004 Liabilities, Ordinary Shares”…
The clause …“combination with Huajin. With the extension of the time to complete a business combination by September 28, 2026, the Company amended the payment term of the promissory notes, which are payable on the earlier of (i) September”…
The clause …“result, management has determined that such additional conditions also raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from”…
The clause …“and outstanding as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 (excluding 3,577,425 and 4,257,354 shares subject to possible redemption as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively) 34 34 Class B ordinary shares, $”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2025-07-16trust $41.6M → $42.4M +2%deadline 2025-09-28 → 2026-09-28
trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt +12 moved · 2 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $41.6M$42.4M
- Combination deadline
- 2025-09-282026-09-28
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Redeemable shares
- 3.58M · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $775,564 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause “637 Other current assets 48,025 — Total Current Assets 48,050 4,637 Investments held in the Trust Account 42,361,047 48,084,367 Cash in transit to Trust Account 172,500 345,000 Total Assets $ 42,581,597 $ 48,434,004 Liabilities, Ordinary”…
SpacBrain reads this as 365 days later than the previous record.
The clause …“combination with Huajin. With the extension of the time to complete a business combination by September 28, 2026, the Company amended the payment term of the promissory notes, which are payable on the earlier of (i) September”…
The clause …“result, management has determined that such additional conditions also raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from”…
The clause …“issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 (excluding 3,577,425 and 4,257,354 shares subject to possible redemption as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively) 34 34 Class B ordinary shares, $ 0.0001”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
outside datenothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Outside date
- 2026-03-28 · unchanged
The clause …“combination (a “business combination”) from September 28, 2025 (the “Current Outside Date”) to March 28, 2026 (the “Extended Date”) by depositing on or before the 28 th of each month (an “Extension Date”) $0.033 per each remaining”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
What changed: Oak Woods Acquisition Corporation called an extraordinary general meeting for Monday, September 29, 2025 at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time, record date September 11, 2025, to amend its Charter and extend the Combination Period beyond September 28, 2025, an extension the Sponsor had been funding with a monthly fee of $172,500 deposited into the trust. As of September 11, 2025 the trust held approximately $43,189,384.63, a pro rata amount of about $12.07 per share, against a closing price of $11.79 that day. Why it matters: The trust floor is $12.07 a share on $43.2 million, and the market price of $11.79 sits below it - redeeming is worth more than selling. The disclosed plan for insiders holding 33% of the vote to force an adjournment past the charter deadline is the notable item: the company intends to operate beyond its own outside date on procedural grounds. Nine months later Oak Woods would still be extending, with the trust down to $16.4 million.
What changed vs 2025-03-10trust $5.6M → $43.2M +676%deadline 2025-09-28 → 2026-03-28trust account, combination deadline, outside date2 moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $5.6M$43.2M
- Combination deadline
- 2025-09-282026-03-28
- Outside date
- 2026-03-28 · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $37,627,288 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“that the per -share price at which public shares may be redeemed from cash held in the Trust Account will be approximately 43,189,384.63 at the time of the Extraordinary General Meeting. The closing price of one Class A Ordinary”…
SpacBrain reads this as 181 days later than the previous record.
The clause …“Public Shares for a pro rata portion of the trust account in the event such business combination is approved and completed or the Company has not consummated a business combination by March 28, 2026 (assuming full extension). If the”…
The clause …“combination (a “business combination”) from September 28, 2025 (the “Current Outside Date”) to March 28, 2026 (the “Extended Date”). ☐ ☐ ☐ FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN (2) The Adjournment Proposa l — as an ordinary resolution, to approve the”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
outside date1 moved
- Outside date
- 2025-09-282026-03-28
SpacBrain reads this as 181 days later than the previous record.
The clause …“combination (a “business combination”) from September 28, 2025 (the “Current Outside Date”) to March 28, 2026 (the “Extended Date”). ☐ ☐ ☐ FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN (2) The Adjournment Proposa l — as an ordinary resolution, to approve the”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
In plain English
Redemption deadlinethe last day to hand shares back for cash
Set by the filing that calls the meeting. Tender after it and the company is under no obligation to pay you the trust value.
Cash in trust / trust per sharethe cash the company is holding for each public share
Filed quarterly in the 10-Q's XBRL. It earns interest between filings, so the figure on a given day is slightly higher than the last filed one — where we show that we label it an estimate.
Accession numberthe SEC's unique id for one filing
Every figure on this page carries the accession of the filing that states it, so you can open the primary document rather than trust us.