HTPA SEC filings, in plain English
Everything Highland Transcend Partners I Corp. has filed with the SEC that we hold — 40 filings, newest first, 3 with a plain-English summary of what changed and why it matters. Every row links to the primary document on EDGAR, so you can check the source rather than trust us.
The feed
live EDGAR captureNew filings appear here within minutes of hitting EDGAR; summaries follow once the pipeline has read them.
- What changed vs 2022-08-12trust $300.3M → $301.9M +1%
trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt1 moved · 2 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $300.3M$301.9M
- Combination deadline
- 2022-12-07 · unchanged
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $1,594,624 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause “33 489,166 Total Current Assets 213,190 959,002 Investments held in Trust Account 301,914,795 300,120,586 TOTAL ASSETS $ 302,127,985 $ 301,079,588 LIABILITIES, CLASS A ORDINARY SHARES SUBJECT TO”…
The clause …“about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern,” the Company has until December 7, 2022, to consummate a Business Combination. It is uncertain that the Company will be able to consummate a Business Combination by this”…
The clause …“a Business Combination not occur, and potential subsequent dissolution, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company has determined that a Business Combination will not be consummated”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2022-05-16trust $300.1M → $300.3M +0%
trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt1 moved · 2 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $300.1M$300.3M
- Combination deadline
- 2022-12-07 · unchanged
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $192,184 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause “08 489,166 Total Current Assets 434,606 959,002 Investments held in Trust Account 300,320,171 300,120,586 TOTAL ASSETS $ 300,754,777 $ 301,079,588 LIABILITIES, CLASS A ORDINARY SHARES SUBJECT TO”…
The clause …“about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern,” the Company has until December 7, 2022, to consummate a Business Combination. It is uncertain that the Company will be able to consummate a Business Combination by this”…
The clause …“a Business Combination not occur, and potential subsequent dissolution, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management intends to complete a Business Combination; however, the Company”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2021-11-12trust $300.1M → $300.1M +0%going concern APPEARED
trust account, going-concern doubt, combination deadline2 moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $300.1M$300.1M
- Going-concern doubt
- not statedstated
- Combination deadline
- 2022-12-07 · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $17,885 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause “91 489,166 Total Current Assets 678,198 959,002 Investments held in Trust Account 300,127,987 300,120,586 TOTAL ASSETS $ 300,806,185 $ 301,079,588 LIABILITIES, CLASS A ORDINARY SHARES SUBJECT TO”…
SpacBrain reads this as the substantial-doubt sentence is in this filing and not in the previous one.
The clause …“a Business Combination not occur, and potential subsequent dissolution, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management intends to complete a Business Combination, however we cannot”…
The clause …“about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern,” the Company has until December 7, 2022, to consummate a Business Combination. It is uncertain that the Company will be able to consummate a Business Combination by this”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2021-03-30trust $300.0M → $300.1M +0%going concern APPEAREDmandate language changed
trust account, going-concern doubt, mandate language +33 moved · 3 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $300.0M$300.1M
- Going-concern doubt
- not statedstated
- Mandate language
- We intend to pursue a target in the disruptive commerce, dig…we intend to focus our search on companies in the travel & l…
- Combination deadline
- 2022-12-07 · unchanged
- Sponsor loans outstanding
- $81Knot matched in this filing
- Redeemable shares
- 28.6Mnot matched in this filing
SpacBrain reads this as $109,007 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“cash from operating activities. As of December 31, 2021, we had investments held in the Trust Account of $300,120,586 (including $109,007 of interest income) consisting of a money market fund that invests primarily in U.S. Treasury”…
SpacBrain reads this as the substantial-doubt sentence is in this filing and not in the previous one.
The clause …“of applicable law. Our proximity to our liquidation date raises expresses substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a “going concern.” In connection with the Company’s assessment of going concern considerations accordance”…
The clause …“unable to raise additional funds to alleviate liquidity needs and complete a business combination by December 7, 2022 then the Company will cease all operations except for the purpose of liquidating. The liquidity condition and date”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
What changed: Definitive merger proxy for Highland Transcend Partners I Corp.'s combination with Packable Holdings, LLC, formerly known as Entourage Commerce, LLC. Shareholders vote on the business combination and on changing the jurisdiction of incorporation from the Cayman Islands to Delaware, the domestication being expected at least one day before, and conditioned on, closing. The counterparties include GPI Capital Gemini HoldCo LP, GPI Capital Gemini LLC, Carlyle Partners VII Pacer Holdings, L.P., CP VII Pacer Corp. and CP VII Pacer EU L.P. Why it matters: Seven mergers run in three timed waves. Three Blocker Mergers close simultaneously, putting each private-equity blocker under Highland Transcend; the three blockers then merge upward into Highland Transcend itself; and only after that does Company Merger Sub merge into Packable, which survives as a subsidiary. The document's own labels do not line up with its entity names — Picasso Merger Sub IV, LLC is defined as Blocker Merger Sub III while Picasso Merger Sub III, LLC is the Company Merger Sub — so any extraction keyed to the entity names will mis-assign two of the subsidiaries.
What changed: Highland Transcend Partners I Corp. ('Highland Transcend', a Cayman Islands exempted company) filed Amendment No. 4 to its Form S-4; the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus inside is dated February 9, 2022. No explanatory note names the change. It registers 24,629,708 shares of Class A common stock and 15,333,333 warrants to purchase Class A common stock of Highland Transcend after its domestication as a Delaware corporation, to be renamed PACKABLE COMMERCE, INC. Why it matters: Three separate blocker merger subs indicate the target's ownership includes blocker corporations — entities interposed by tax-sensitive investors, typically funds, between themselves and a pass-through operating company. Each blocker must be merged out separately, so the transaction has multiple parallel legs that must all complete, and the resulting share allocation depends on how each blocker's holders are treated. The registered ceiling is 24,629,708 Class A shares plus warrants over 15,333,333 more — the warrant leg is roughly 62% of the share leg, an unusually large overhang.
What changed: Highland Transcend Partners I Corp. ('Highland Transcend', a Cayman Islands exempted company) filed Amendment No. 3 to its Form S-4; the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus inside is dated January 21, 2022. No explanatory note names the change. It registers 24,629,708 shares of Class A common stock and 15,333,333 warrants to purchase Class A common stock of Highland Transcend after its domestication as a Delaware corporation, to be renamed Packable Commerce, Inc. The board approved an agreement and plan of merger dated September 8, 2021. Why it matters: The registered ceiling — 24,629,708 Class A shares plus warrants over 15,333,333 more — is identical to the amendment that follows, so it was fixed at this stage. The warrant leg is roughly 62% of the share leg, an unusually large overhang relative to the shares registered. No vote date is stated in this portion.
In plain English
Redemption deadlinethe last day to hand shares back for cash
Set by the filing that calls the meeting. Tender after it and the company is under no obligation to pay you the trust value.
Cash in trust / trust per sharethe cash the company is holding for each public share
Filed quarterly in the 10-Q's XBRL. It earns interest between filings, so the figure on a given day is slightly higher than the last filed one — where we show that we label it an estimate.
Accession numberthe SEC's unique id for one filing
Every figure on this page carries the accession of the filing that states it, so you can open the primary document rather than trust us.