Loading
Distinct shells carrying a filed role for this person — not every shell they have ever touched.
Of those vehicles, the ones that closed a merger.
Announced but not closed, and still hunting.
No closed vehicle here has both a stored price and a filed trust value to score it against.
1 vehicle on file, newest listing first
none appears on more than one
Charles Ecalle, the managers of our sponsor, who have voting and dispositive power over the shares held by our sponsor and none of our other directors or officers is deemed to have a beneficial interest in such shares. ​ (4) Includes up to 625,000 founder shares that will be surrendered to us for no consideration by our sponsor depending on the extent to which the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised. ​ (5) Does not include any shares held by our sponsor, of which each officer and director is a member. This individual has an indirect economic interest in shares owned by our sponsor. ​ Immediately after this offering, our sponsor will beneficially own 27.6% of the then issued and outstanding ordinary shares (assuming they do not purchase any units in this offering and including private placement shares and assuming the underwriters’ over-allotment option is not exercised) and will have the right to elect all of our directors prior to our initial business combination.
This record is keyed to SEC CIK 0001923785 — the identifier this person files under in their own name. Every vehicle above is a filing made under that CIK, so “the same person on two shells” is a fact about an SEC identifier rather than about a name that happens to match.
Roles are the strings the filings used, in the order they were filed. Nothing on this page ranks them, infers seniority, or offers a reason why any two of these names recur — a recurrence is a count, and the filings that produced it are linked beside every row. We also hold 22 institutional-holder rows on these vehicles, under 17 distinct name strings, and none of them is counted across vehicles: that table has no CIK column, and matching holders by name would merge firms that are not the same firm.