Skip to main content
spacbrain
← Sponsor Score ranking

Ares Management

#72 of 117
50/100Mixed recordlow confidence

50/100 from 2 resolved vehicles (1 closed, 1 failed), 29% of the raw 49 after small-sample shrink, completion credit gated ×0.90 by the measured post-close record. Confidence: low.

Vehicles
3
1 in the live DB · 2 SEC-verified priors · computed by SpacBrain from cited rows, as of 2026-09-09
Resolved
2
1 closed · 0 liquidated · 1 terminated
Best priced exit
-58.4%
KDK vs the $10.00 baseline
Worst priced exit
-58.4%
KDK vs the $10.00 baseline

Sponsor DNA

what has happened before, with its sample size
  • Completion raten=2 resolved vehiclesderived

    2 resolved vehicles on record; this rate is published from 3. Below three the percentage can only be 0, 50 or 100 and says less than the counts beside it.

  • Liquidation raten=2 resolved vehiclesderived

    2 resolved vehicles on record; this rate is published from 3. Below three the percentage can only be 0, 50 or 100 and says less than the counts beside it.

  • Median post-close returnn=1 priced completed deSPACderived

    1 priced completed deSPAC on record; this median is published from 3. Two points have no middle — a median over them is their mean, and moves with either one.

  • Median redemptionn=0 redemption events with a stated ratederived

    No redemption event with a stated rate on record — absent, which is not the same as zero. Extraction covers part of the universe, so a low count is our coverage as much as the sponsor’s history.

  • Deals terminated1terminated dealcounted

    1 announced combination has been terminated on this sponsor's record — 0 on a live vehicle, 1 on a vehicle that then wound up.

  • Extension votes on record0extension votescounted

    No extension vote extracted for this sponsor. Extraction is partial across the universe, so this is an absence of rows, NOT evidence of zero extensions.

2 of 6 statistics carry a figure for this sponsor. A rate is published from 3 resolved vehicles and a median from 3 observations: two points have no middle, and a rate over two can only be 0, 50 or 100. Counts have no threshold — a count is an observation, not an estimate.

Everything marked derived is arithmetic we did to rows we hold, not a figure any filing states.

What this panel will not tell you, and why (6)
  • Median day-one move on announcement

    PriceBar holds 2026-05-11 → 2026-08-17 only. Of 83 dated announcements across the whole universe, 16 fall on a day we hold a bar for a scored sponsor’s vehicle, spread over 14 sponsors — one sponsor reaches three observations. A bar that does not exist is not a 0% move.

  • Pre-vote move

    Only 12 deals carry a vote date at all, and exactly 1 of them falls inside the PriceBar window. One observation is an anecdote with a decimal point.

  • Median time from IPO to announcement

    42 IPO→announcement pairs exist, but only six sponsors have two and one has three. Enough for a statistic about the asset class; not for one about a sponsor, which is what this panel claims to be.

  • Median time from signing to close

    Exactly 1 deal in the entire database is CLOSED and carries an announcement date. There is no 2nd observation anywhere to take a median over.

  • 12-month post-deSPAC return

    `SponsorPriorVehicle.postCloseReturnPct` is measured at the LAST close we hold, whenever that is — not on a 12-month anniversary. We hold no price history for the resulting companies, so the anniversary price does not exist. The median post-close return above is the honest version of this number and says what it is measured against.

  • Sponsor capital at risk

    Nothing stores it. The only sponsor-economics column we hold is `Deal.promotePct` (founder shares as a percentage of post-IPO shares, on 34 deals under a scored sponsor), and that measures the equity the sponsor got nearly free — the opposite of the dollars it put in. Deriving at-risk capital from a promote percentage would be an invention with a citation stapled to it.

Score breakdown

every component, what it measured, and what it could not
  • Deal completion20% weightn=245/100

    1/2 resolved vehicles closed a deal (50%); 0 liquidated, 1 terminated. Gated ×0.90 by measured post-close quality (40/100): closing deals that ended below trust value is not a completed job, so only 90% of the completion credit is earned. Full credit resumes at outcome quality 50/100 (the median deSPAC ending at trust value); the gate can never exceed 1×. Small sample — the shrink below keeps this near neutral.

  • Liquidation / termination drag16% weightn=358/100

    0 liquidations and 1 termination across 3 vehicles raised → 42% attrition (terminations 1.25×, stale shells 0.75×).

  • Post-close outcome quality40% weightn=140/100

    1 priced deSPAC vs trust value (prior vehicles against the $10.00 IPO baseline, in-DB vehicles against the trust they filed): median -58%, 0/1 still worth at least half of trust, 0 at under a tenth of it. Worst: KDK -58%. n=1, pulled toward neutral.

  • Redemption behaviour10% weightnot measurable

    No redemption events extracted for this sponsor yet (coverage is partial) — held neutral; absence of rows is NOT evidence of zero redemptions.

    Held at the neutral 50 across its full 10% weight — missing data is never scored as a failure, but it never earns credit either.

  • Extension reliance8% weightnot measurable

    No extension filings extracted for this sponsor — held neutral (partial coverage, not a clean record).

    Held at the neutral 50 across its full 8% weight — missing data is never scored as a failure, but it never earns credit either.

  • Live fleet vs trust6% weightn=1100/100

    1/1 live vehicle trading at or above the trust value it filed.

  • Measured weak recordflat penaltyn=1not measurable

    Only 1 measured prior vehicle (median -58%) — one vehicle is an anecdote, not a record; the rule needs ≥2.

How the number is built: weighted mean of the six components above = 49, then pulled 71% of the way back to the neutral 50 for small sample size (2 resolved vehicles) = 50.

2 components are not measurable for this sponsor (redemption behaviour, extension reliance) — 18% of the weight is a neutral placeholder rather than evidence. That is why the confidence chip reads low.

How the Sponsor Score worksoutcome-first weighting

The score answers one question: did this sponsor make money for the people who held through the merger? Not “did they get a deal signed”. Those are different questions, and most sponsor rankings quietly answer the second one.

So post-close outcome quality carries 40% — the realised return of every prior vehicle we can price from a primary filing, measured against the $10.00 trust baseline. Deal completion carries 20%, and it is gated: closing deals that ended below trust value only earns part of the completion credit, because closing is a precondition for a return, not a return. Liquidation and termination drag takes 16%, redemption behaviour 10%, extension reliance 8%, and what the tape says about the live fleet just 6% — a quote is an opinion, not evidence.

A component with no data is never guessed. It is held at the neutral 50 across its full weight and labelled “not measurable”. Dropping it and re-weighting the rest would quietly reward a sponsor for having no verifiable record — exactly backwards. The consequence: a sponsor with no post-close evidence at all cannot read above 71, and cannot be labelled a strong operator no matter how many deals it closed.

Experience never inflates the score. There is no “years in business” component. A first-time sponsor sits at exactly 50 and reads “unproven” with low confidence — new is not bad. Sample size only pulls a score toward or away from that neutral 50, so nobody is called great or terrible on one vehicle.

Every input is a row already in the database, sourced from SEC primary filings: prior vehicles verified on EDGAR, redemption results read out of 8-Ks, prices from public feeds. The arithmetic is deterministic — no model, no LLM, no judgement call. Research tooling, not investment advice.

Prior vehicles

2 SEC-verified — what happened to holders who stayed in
VehicleOutcomeBecamevs $10.00TodaySource
Ares Acquisition Corp IIIPO 2023CompletedKodiak AIKDK-58.4%Trading$4.16 · Aug 14, 20260001628280-26-054331 opens on sec.gov in a new tab
Ares Acquisition Corp IIPO 2021TerminatedX-Energy (deal terminated → liquidated)0001143313-23-000162 opens on sec.gov in a new tab

1 of 2 prior vehicles carry an honest post-close price, split-adjusted against the $10.00 trust baseline a holder gave up at the merger. Cash buyouts are read from the per-share consideration stated in the DEFM14A / SC 14D-9; a buyout no filing prices stays unpriced and stays out of the score. “Listing ended” means the quote stopped with no buyer — scored as a total loss because that is what the evidence says, but never printed as a percentage we cannot source.

Current fleet

the vehicles running today

Research profile

synthesized from SEC filings + sourced research

Ares Management — Ares Acquisition Corp series. Prior-vehicle track record (SEC-verified via formerNames): (1) Ares Acquisition Corp II COMPLETED → Kodiak AI (KDK, Nasdaq, 2025). (2) Ares Acquisition Corp I — X-Energy business combination TERMINATED (Nov 2023), then LIQUIDATED (25-NSE 2023-11, 15-12G). Current vehicle AAC (Ares Acquisition Corp III) searching. Net: 1 completed deSPAC, 1 terminated→liquidated. Sources: SEC EDGAR submissions API (formerNames) + full-text search, efts.sec.gov.

— research profile — Ares Management Corporation serves as the sponsor of the Ares Acquisition Corporation (AAC) series of special purpose acquisition companies. Founded in 1997 and headquartered in Los Angeles, Ares is a global alternative investment manager with approximately $671 billion in assets under management, operating across credit, private equity, real estate, and real assets. The SPAC vehicles are led by senior Ares executives: David Kaplan, a co-founder of Ares, serves as CEO and Co-Chairman of the AAC vehicles; Michael Arougheti, co-founder and CEO of Ares Management Corporation, serves as Co-Chairman; Jarrod Phillips, CFO and Partner at Ares, serves as CFO of the SPACs; and Allyson Satin, a Partner at Ares, serves as Chief Operating Officer of AACT.

Ares has sponsored three SPACs since 2021, producing a mixed track record. The first vehicle, Ares Acquisition Corporation, announced a merger with advanced nuclear reactor developer X-energy, but the parties mutually terminated the agreement in October 2023 citing challenging market conditions and peer-company trading performance. AAC subsequently liquidated, redeeming public shares at approximately $10.79, though an Ares-affiliated vehicle made a private investment to support X-energy's continued growth as a private company. The second vehicle, Ares Acquisition Corporation II, went public in 2023 and completed its business combination with Kodiak AI, a leader in AI-powered autonomous trucking, in September 2025. The deal ascribed a pre-money equity value of approximately $2.

Data provenance & audit trail1 internal entry

Written by SpacBrain’s data agents whenever a figure is captured, corrected or flagged, and kept verbatim so every number on this page can be traced back to the filing that states it. This is a running log, not the current record: an early entry may be superseded by a later correction — the panels above always hold the current values.

Ares Management — sponsor record
NOTE-SEAL2026-08-15

Raw SEC identifiers lifted out of the public prose above (the sentences are unchanged); verbatim, each shown with the words it followed: "…a formerNames): (1) Ares Acquisition Corp II (CIK 0001853138)" · "…, Nasdaq, 2025). (2) Ares Acquisition Corp I (CIK 0001829432)"

The Sponsor Score is a deterministic research heuristic over primary-sourced rows — never a recommendation, and never a prediction. It cannot tell you whether this sponsor’s next deal will work; it tells you, precisely and with its own uncertainty attached, what the last ones did.