WNNR SEC filings, in plain English
Everything Andretti Acquisition Corp. has filed with the SEC that we hold — 40 filings, newest first, 4 with a plain-English summary of what changed and why it matters. Every row links to the primary document on EDGAR, so you can check the source rather than trust us.
The feed
live EDGAR captureNew filings appear here within minutes of hitting EDGAR; summaries follow once the pipeline has read them.
What changed: Q2 2026 10-Q of Zapata Quantum, Inc., filed under Andretti Acquisition Corp's CIK; the cover states no securities registered under Section 12(b). The company reported no revenue in either period. Operating expenses were $1,627 thousand for the quarter versus $584 thousand, producing a net loss of $(1,835) thousand against net income of $2,700 thousand a year earlier, which had included gains on extinguishment of a forward purchase agreement settlement liability ($2,357 thousand) and of liabilities ($1,197 thousand). Why it matters: The quarter's cash increase and the move out of stockholders' deficit come from a preferred-stock financing, not operations, and the prior-year comparative income was extinguishment gains. Convertible promissory notes of $3,107 thousand and senior secured notes of $1,430 thousand remain classified current.
going-concern doubtnothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
The clause …“market. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 205-40, Going Concern , the Company’s management has evaluated whether there are certain conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
What changed: Item 7.01 8-K of Zapata Quantum, Inc. On August 12, 2026 the company issued a press release announcing a partnership with QuEra, furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and expressly not deemed filed for Section 18 purposes. Why it matters: The 8-K body names the counterparty and nothing else — no scope, term, or financial commitment is stated, and those would only be in the furnished exhibit.
What changed: Zapata Quantum, Inc. entered an Exclusive Broker-Dealer and Leak-Out Management Agreement with Chardan Capital Markets LLC on July 30, 2026, making Chardan the exclusive broker-dealer and management agent for potential sales of shares held by stockholders bound by the Universal Resale and Registration provisions. Commission is 4% of gross sale proceeds, reducing automatically to 3% once aggregate commissions reach $200,000. On termination or expiry other than for Chardan's uncured material breach, the company must pay the excess, if any, of $400,000 over commissions already received. Why it matters: The agreement routes resales of a restricted block through a single desk with a leak-out arrangement, which is how an issuer paces supply that would otherwise reach the market at once. The $400,000 floor is an obligation of the company whether or not sales occur, so it is a cost that exists even if the resale programme does not.
What changed: Zapata Quantum, Inc., the Andretti Acquisition Corp. successor, furnished a July 7, 2026 press release announcing that Chief Executive Officer Sumit Kapur would present at the Global Technology Virtual Investor Conference on Thursday, July 9, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. Eastern Time. The release is Exhibit 99.1 and the filing states the information is not deemed filed for Section 18 purposes or incorporated by reference. The report carries an Item 3.02 unregistered sales caption although its text describes only the conference appearance. Why it matters: An announcement that an executive will speak at an investor conference carries no trust, redemption right or deadline consequence — the item is scheduling rather than disclosure, and the deck itself was furnished two days later. The mismatch between the Item 3.02 unregistered equity sales caption and the conference-only text is a tagging error worth noting for anyone screening filings by item code, since it would surface this report as an equity issuance when none is described.
going-concern doubtnothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
The clause …“market. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 205-40, Going Concern , the Company’s management has evaluated whether there are certain conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
going-concern doubtnothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
The clause …“be dependent on our ability to raise sufficient capital. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our business plan also contemplates a substantial scaling of Zapata across all”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
going-concern doubtnothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
The clause “S (UNAUDITED) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share and share amounts) Going Concern The Company has evaluated whether there are certain conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
going-concern doubtnothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
The clause …“solutions combined software and related services and were subscription-based. Going Concern The Company has evaluated whether there are certain conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
going-concern doubtnothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
The clause …“solutions combined software and related services and were subscription based. Going Concern The Company has evaluated whether there are certain conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
going-concern doubtnothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
The clause …“solutions combined software and related services and were subscription-based. Going Concern The Company has evaluated whether there are certain conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt +1nothing moved · 4 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $86.3Mnot matched in this filing
- Combination deadline
- 2024-04-18not matched in this filing
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Redeemable shares
- 7.89Mnot matched in this filing
The clause …“be dependent on our ability to raise sufficient capital. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our business plan also contemplates a substantial scaling of Zapata across all”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
In plain English
Redemption deadlinethe last day to hand shares back for cash
Set by the filing that calls the meeting. Tender after it and the company is under no obligation to pay you the trust value.
Cash in trust / trust per sharethe cash the company is holding for each public share
Filed quarterly in the 10-Q's XBRL. It earns interest between filings, so the figure on a given day is slightly higher than the last filed one — where we show that we label it an estimate.
Accession numberthe SEC's unique id for one filing
Every figure on this page carries the accession of the filing that states it, so you can open the primary document rather than trust us.