LJAQ SEC filings, in plain English
Everything LIGHTJUMP ACQUISITION CORP has filed with the SEC that we hold — 40 filings, newest first, 2 with a plain-English summary of what changed and why it matters. Every row links to the primary document on EDGAR, so you can check the source rather than trust us.
The feed
live EDGAR captureNew filings appear here within minutes of hitting EDGAR; summaries follow once the pipeline has read them.
What changed: LightJump Acquisition Corporation called a special meeting for December 27, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern time by live webcast on its Business Combination Agreement dated June 14, 2022 with Moolec Science SA and Holdco. Based on approximately $27,993,798 in the Trust Account on July 12, 2022 and 2,767,210 public shares outstanding, the estimated per-share redemption price would have been approximately $10.12. Warrants carry no redemption rights. The proxy discloses that Nomura Securities International resigned as exclusive financial advisor to Moolec effective April 27, 2022. Why it matters: An advisor resigning from a live SPAC transaction and notifying the SEC is a rare and pointed signal — it is the kind of disclosure that usually precedes valuation or diligence problems, and LJAQ holders should weigh it heavily against the roughly $10.12 redemption alternative. With only 2,767,210 public shares left the vehicle is already largely redeemed, so the cash reaching Moolec is small. Warrant holders have no redemption right at all.
outside datenothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Outside date
- not previously extracted2022-07-12
SpacBrain reads this as the agreement may be terminated from 2022-07-12.
The clause …“Proposal shall be approved at a relevant SPAC Shareholders’ Meeting and (ii) July 12, 2022 (the “ Outside Date ”); provided , however , that this Agreement may not be terminated under this Section 10.01(b) by or on behalf of any Party”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2022-08-15trust $138.2M → $138.0M -0%shares 13.8M → 2.77M -80%
trust account, redeemable shares, combination deadline +12 moved · 2 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $138.2M$138.0M
- Redeemable shares
- 13.8M2.77M
- Combination deadline
- 2023-01-12 · unchanged
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $187,600 left the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“Inputs 2021 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Assets: U.S. Money Market held in Trust Account $ 138,013,319 $ 138,013,319 $ — $ — Liabilities: Private Warrant Liability $ 2,198,205 $ — $ — 2,198,205 18 The Private Warrants were”…
SpacBrain reads this as 11,032,790 shares are no longer redeemable.
The clause …“authorized; 3,570,000 and 3,570,000 shares issued and outstanding (excluding 2,767,210 and 13,800,000 shares subject to possible redemption), as of September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively 357 357 Additional paid-in”…
The clause “Company must consummate its initial business combination from July 12, 2022 to January 12, 2023 (the “Extension Combination Period”). On August 9, 2022, $276,721 was deposited into the Trust Account to fund the extension, which is”…
The clause …“sufficient to pay or provide for creditors’ claims. 10 These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern through the liquidation date if a business combination is not consummated. These”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2022-05-16trust $138.0M → $138.2M +0%
trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt +11 moved · 3 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $138.0M$138.2M
- Combination deadline
- not previously extracted2023-01-12
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Redeemable shares
- 13.8M · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $175,297 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause “Prepaid expenses 221,788 19,030 Total current assets 227,210 156,193 Investment held in Trust Account 138,200,919 138,013,319 Total Assets $ 138,428,129 $ 138,169,512 Liabilities, Redeemable Common Stock, and Stockholders’ Deficit Current”…
The clause …“must consummate its initial business combination from July 12, 2022 to January 12, 2023. Stockholders holding 11,032,790 Public Shares exercised their right to redeem such shares for a pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust”…
The clause …“sufficient to pay or provide for creditors’ claims. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern through the next 12 months, if a business combination is not consummated. These”…
The clause “9,000,000 shares authorized; 3,570,000 shares issued and outstanding (excluding 13,800,000 shares subject to possible redemption), as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021 357 357 Additional paid-in capital — — Accumulated deficit (”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
What changed: LightJump Acquisition Corporation called a completely virtual special meeting for July 8, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern to extend the deadline from July 12, 2022 to January 12, 2023. Sponsor LightJump One Founders, LLC owns 3,450,000 founder shares issued before the IPO. If the extension passes, the sponsor will contribute as a loan the lesser of $600,000 or $0.10 per unredeemed public share, plus for each of the three calendar months beginning October 12, 2022 the lesser of $200,000 or $0.033 per unredeemed public share. Why it matters: An initial $0.10 per share deposit is generous by 2022 standards, adding roughly 1% of a $10 share up front, with $0.033 a month thereafter, so holders who stay are meaningfully compensated for the six-month wait rather than merely delayed. The dollar caps of $600,000 and $200,000 bind once the float exceeds six million shares, above which the per-share rate falls. Redemption at pro rata trust value remains available regardless of how a holder votes, so the deposit terms are the price of staying rather than a constraint on leaving.
- What changed vs 2021-11-22trust $138.0M → $138.0M +0%
trust account, going-concern doubt, redeemable shares1 moved · 2 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $138.0M$138.0M
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Redeemable shares
- 13.8M · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $15,782 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause “Prepaid expenses 321,253 19,030 Total current assets 520,483 156,193 Investment held in Trust Account 138,025,622 138,013,319 Total Assets $ 138,546,105 $ 138,169,512 Liabilities, Redeemable Common Stock, and Stockholders’ Deficit Current”…
The clause …“sufficient to pay or provide for creditors’ claims. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern through the next 12 months, if a business combination is not consummated. These”…
The clause “9,000,000 shares authorized; 3,570,000 shares issued and outstanding (excluding 13,800,000 shares subject to possible redemption as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021) 357 357 Additional paid-in capital — — Accumulated deficit (”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2021-04-15deadline 2022-06-12 → 2022-07-12going concern APPEARED
combination deadline, going-concern doubt, trust account +32 moved · 4 with no prior record of ours
- Combination deadline
- 2022-06-122022-07-12
- Going-concern doubt
- not statedstated
- Trust account
- not previously extracted$138.0M
- Redeemable shares
- not previously extracted13.8M
- Sponsor loans outstanding
- $125K · unchanged
- Mandate language
- we are focusing our search on technology or technology enabl… · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as 30 days later than the previous record.
The clause “Going Concern,” we have determined that if the Company is unable to complete a Business Combination by July 12, 2022, then the Company will cease all operations except for the purpose of liquidating. The date for mandatory liquidation”…
SpacBrain reads this as the substantial-doubt sentence is in this filing and not in the previous one.
The clause …“accounting firm’s report contains an explanatory paragraph that expresses substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a “going concern;” ● Our warrants are accounted for as liabilities and changes in the value of our warrants”…
The clause “6,259 Prepaid expenses 19,030 — Total current assets 156,193 312,398 Investment held in Trust Account 138,013,319 — Total Assets $ 138,169,512 $ 312,398 Liabilities, Redeemable Common Stock, and Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity Current”…
The clause …“there were 3,570,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, excluding 13,800,000 and 0 shares subject to possible redemption at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Note 10 — Income Tax The Company’s net deferred tax assets”…
The clause …“not held in the Trust Account. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had borrowed $125,000 under the promissory note with the Sponsor which is still outstanding as of December 31, 2021. Working Capital Loans In order to finance”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2021-08-16trust $138.0M → $138.0M +0%shares 12.9M → 13.8M +7%
trust account, redeemable shares, going-concern doubt2 moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $138.0M$138.0M
- Redeemable shares
- 12.9M13.8M
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $3,479 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“Prepaid expenses 136,592 - Total current assets 356,050 312,398 Investment held in Trust Account 138,009,840 - Total Assets $ 138,365,890 $ 312,398 Liabilities and Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity Current liabilities: Accrued offering”…
SpacBrain reads this as 891,877 more shares carry a redemption right.
The clause …“there were 3,570,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, excluding 13,800,000 and 0 shares subject to possible redemption at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. Note 11 — Subsequent Events The Company”…
The clause …“be able to obtain the additional financing required. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern through the next 12 months from the date of issuance of this report, if a”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2021-07-02trust $138.0M → $138.0M +0%shares 13.1M → 12.9M -1%
trust account, redeemable shares, going-concern doubt2 moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $138.0M$138.0M
- Redeemable shares
- 13.1M12.9M
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $3,441 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“Prepaid expenses 244,094 - Total current assets 581,697 312,398 Investment held in Trust Account 138,006,361 - Total Assets $ 138,588,058 $ 312,398 Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Current liabilities: Accrued offering costs $ -”…
SpacBrain reads this as 186,825 shares are no longer redeemable.
The clause “70,000 , shares of common stock issued and outstanding, respectively, excluding 12,908,123 shares subject to possible redemption at June 30, 2021. Note 10 — Subsequent Events The Company evaluated subsequent events and transactions that”…
The clause …“be able to obtain the additional financing required. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern through the next 12 months, if a business combination is not consummated. These”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2021-03-01trust $138.0M → $138.0M +0%going concern APPEARED
trust account, going-concern doubt, redeemable shares +12 moved · 2 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $138.0M$138.0M
- Going-concern doubt
- not statedstated
- Redeemable shares
- not previously extracted13.1M
- Sponsor loans outstanding
- $125Knot matched in this filing
SpacBrain reads this as $2,231 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“Prepaid expenses 360,586 - Total current assets 882,776 312,398 Investment held in Trust Account 138,002,920 - Total Assets $ 138,885,696 $ 312,398 Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Current liabilities: Accrued offering costs $”…
SpacBrain reads this as the substantial-doubt sentence is in this filing and not in the previous one.
The clause …“be able to obtain the additional financing required. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern through the next 12 months, if a business combination is not consummated. These”…
The clause “570,000, shares of common stock issued and outstanding, respectively, excluding 13,094,948 shares subject to possible redemption at March 31, 2021. Note 10 — Subsequent Events The Company evaluated subsequent events and transactions that”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
In plain English
Redemption deadlinethe last day to hand shares back for cash
Set by the filing that calls the meeting. Tender after it and the company is under no obligation to pay you the trust value.
Cash in trust / trust per sharethe cash the company is holding for each public share
Filed quarterly in the 10-Q's XBRL. It earns interest between filings, so the figure on a given day is slightly higher than the last filed one — where we show that we label it an estimate.
Accession numberthe SEC's unique id for one filing
Every figure on this page carries the accession of the filing that states it, so you can open the primary document rather than trust us.