EVLV SEC filings, in plain English
Everything NewHold Investment Corp. has filed with the SEC that we hold — 40 filings, newest first, 4 with a plain-English summary of what changed and why it matters. Every row links to the primary document on EDGAR, so you can check the source rather than trust us.
The feed
live EDGAR captureNew filings appear here within minutes of hitting EDGAR; summaries follow once the pipeline has read them.
What changed: The 10-Q filed under Commission file number 001-39417 is that of Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: EVLV) for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, with 181,126,146 Class A shares outstanding as of August 4, 2026. Why it matters: Receivables grew $8.7 million while marketable securities fell $9.9 million over six months, so cash rose without the asset base growing. Property and equipment of $129.0 million is the largest single asset, consistent with the subscription model in which the company owns deployed units. The liabilities and results are not in the portion of the document read here.
What changed: Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: EVLV) furnished a press release dated August 11, 2026 reporting second quarter 2026 results. Revenue was $43.8 million, up 34% from $32.5 million, ending annual recurring revenue $132.7 million, up 20% from $110.5 million, and remaining performance obligation $312.6 million, up $13.6 million sequentially, with 70 new customers added. Net loss narrowed to $9.3 million, or $(0.05) per share, from $40.5 million, or $(0.25); adjusted EBITDA was $4.4 million against $2.1 million. Why it matters: Revenue is growing faster than ARR — 34% against 20% — because the mix is shifting toward the purchase subscription model, which recognises hardware revenue and cost up front. That is why the company raised revenue guidance while warning on gross margin percentage, and why ARR rather than revenue is the measure of the recurring base.
What changed: Exhibit 99.2 to an 8-K of Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.: the Stipulation of Settlement resolving the company's stockholder derivative matters — the consolidated Massachusetts action (In re Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation, No. 1:24-cv-12822-ADB, D. Mass.), the Delaware Court of Chancery actions Bersch v. George and Patrick v. Charlton, and a Section 220 books-and-records demand and pre-suit litigation demand by stockholder Nicholas R. Ingrao. The stipulation names Evolv as nominal defendant and 24 individual defendants. Why it matters: The consideration to the company is governance reforms rather than a payment, while $1,275,000 of stockholders' counsel fees is proposed. Nothing is effective until the court approves, and the release of claims is conditioned on that approval.
What changed: Evolv Technologies Holdings set its annual meeting for Thursday, June 18, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. ET by live webcast, record date April 24, 2026. The letter reports 2025 results: annual recurring revenue up 21% to $120.5 million from $99.4 million in 2024; net loss narrowed to $33.1 million, or $0.20 per diluted share, from $54.0 million and $0.34 in 2024; and adjusted EBITDA swung to positive $11.1 million from negative $21.0 million. The company attributes part of the change to a mid-2025 shift to directly fulfilling the hardware portion of subscription orders. Why it matters: For a de-SPAC successor the relevant floor is operating cash generation, not a trust: adjusted EBITDA turning from negative $21.0 million to positive $11.1 million in a single year, with the net loss halved, materially reduces the odds of a dilutive rescue financing. Board turnover is disclosed alongside - Bilal Zuberi resigned February 10, 2026 and Henrik Kuhl was appointed February 12, 2026 - so the audit and compensation committees were reconstituted just before this proxy.
mandate languagenothing moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Mandate language
- we will focus on leveraging our existing relationships to ex…not matched in this filing
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2025-04-28going concern APPEARED
going-concern doubt, mandate language1 moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Going-concern doubt
- not statedstated
- Mandate language
- We intend to pursue additional intellectual property protect… · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as the substantial-doubt sentence is in this filing and not in the previous one.
The clause “014-15, Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), management must evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
In plain English
Redemption deadlinethe last day to hand shares back for cash
Set by the filing that calls the meeting. Tender after it and the company is under no obligation to pay you the trust value.
Cash in trust / trust per sharethe cash the company is holding for each public share
Filed quarterly in the 10-Q's XBRL. It earns interest between filings, so the figure on a given day is slightly higher than the last filed one — where we show that we label it an estimate.
Accession numberthe SEC's unique id for one filing
Every figure on this page carries the accession of the filing that states it, so you can open the primary document rather than trust us.