ENER SEC filings, in plain English
Everything ACCRETION ACQUISITION CORP. has filed with the SEC that we hold — 40 filings, newest first, 1 with a plain-English summary of what changed and why it matters. Every row links to the primary document on EDGAR, so you can check the source rather than trust us.
The feed
live EDGAR captureNew filings appear here within minutes of hitting EDGAR; summaries follow once the pipeline has read them.
- What changed vs 2023-03-28trust $214.0M → $56.0M -74%deadline 2023-07-25 → 2023-12-25sponsor loan $73K → $1.4M
trust account, combination deadline, sponsor loans outstanding3 moved
- Trust account
- $214.0M$56.0M
- Combination deadline
- 2023-07-252023-12-25
- Sponsor loans outstanding
- $73K$1.4M
SpacBrain reads this as $158,018,526 left the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“days prior to the Stockholder Meeting), based on the aggregate amount on deposit in the Trust Account of approximately $55,999,253 as of November 21, 2023 (including interest not previously released to the Company to pay its”…
SpacBrain reads this as 153 days later than the previous record.
The clause …“approved an amendment to the charter to provide that the Company would have until December 25, 2023 (the “ Original Extension Date ”) to complete a Business Combination. In connection with such amendment, the Company offered”…
SpacBrain reads this as the sponsor has advanced $1,304,500 more.
The clause …“$8,110,000 purchase price for 8,110,000 Private Placement Warrants, and the $1,377,750 outstanding under loans made by the Sponsor to the Company. Assuming a trading price of $10.53 per share of Common Stock and $0.01 per Public”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt +1nothing moved · 4 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $212.1M · unchanged
- Combination deadline
- 2023-12-25 · unchanged
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Mandate language
- the Company intends to concentrate its efforts to focus iden… · unchanged
The clause …“2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company had approximately $ 55.68 million and $ 212.09 million, respectively, of assets held in the Trust Account in an interest-bearing demand deposit account and in trading securities, respectively. On”…
The clause …“of the Extension Amendment Proposal, the Company’s plan is to complete a Business Combination on or prior to December 25, 2023, however it is uncertain that the Company will be able to consummate a Business Combination or obtain an”…
The clause …“is not requested by the sponsor, and potential subsequent dissolution raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Further to the approval of the Extension Amendment Proposal, the Company’s plan”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2023-05-19trust $214.3M → $212.1M -1%
trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt +11 moved · 3 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $214.3M$212.1M
- Combination deadline
- 2023-12-25 · unchanged
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Mandate language
- the Company intends to concentrate its efforts to focus iden… · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $2,194,306 left the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company had approximately $ 54.98 million and $ 212.09 million, respectively, of assets held in the Trust Account in an interest-bearing demand deposit account and in trading securities respectively. On”…
The clause …“of the Extension Amendment Proposal, the Company’s plan is to complete a Business Combination on or prior to December 25, 2023, however it is uncertain that the Company will be able to consummate a Business Combination or obtain an”…
The clause …“is not requested by the sponsor, and potential subsequent dissolution raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Further to the approval of the Extension Amendment Proposal, the Company’s plan”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2022-11-14trust $210.3M → $214.3M +2%
trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt +21 moved · 4 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $210.3M$214.3M
- Combination deadline
- not previously extracted2023-12-25
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Mandate language
- the Company intends to concentrate its efforts to focus iden… · unchanged
- Redeemable shares
- 18.0Mnot matched in this filing
SpacBrain reads this as $3,974,306 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“current 167,443 241,314 Total Current Assets 171,089 347,540 Cash held in Trust Account 214,284,306 212,089,872 Total Assets $ 214,455,395 $ 212,437,412 Liabilities, Common Stock Subject to Possible”…
The clause …“of the Extension Amendment Proposal, the Company’s plan is to complete a Business Combination on or prior to December 25, 2023, however it is uncertain that the Company will be able to consummate a Business Combination or obtain an”…
The clause …“is not requested by the sponsor, and potential subsequent dissolution raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Further to the approval of the Extension Amendment Proposal, the Company’s plan”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2022-03-31trust $209.1M → $212.1M +1%
trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt +21 moved · 4 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $209.1M$212.1M
- Combination deadline
- not previously extracted2023-07-25
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Mandate language
- We intend to focus our search for a target business in, or r… · unchanged
- Redeemable shares
- 18.0M · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $3,017,118 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“31, 2022, the Company had $ 0.11 million in its operating bank account, and $ 212.09 million of cash held in the Trust Account to be used for a Business Combination or to repurchase or redeem its common stock in connection therewith”…
The clause …“becomes effective, in the event that the Company has not consummated a Business Combination by July 25, 2023, without approval of the Company’s stockholders, the Company may, by resolution of the Board, if requested by the”…
The clause …“accounting firm’s report contains an explanatory paragraph that expresses substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a “going concern.” As of December 31, 2022, we had working capital deficiency of $0.99 million. Further, we”…
The clause …“having been restated to reflect the share dividend in October 2021 (excluding 18,000,000 shares of common stock subject to possible redemption). Of the 5,295,000 shares of common stock outstanding, an aggregate of up to 675,000 shares”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
What changed: Accretion Acquisition Corp. called a special meeting for April 14, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. Mountain Time to extend the Termination Date from April 25, 2023. Within five business days of the meeting the Lender, being the Sponsor or its designees, deposits the lesser of an aggregate $240,000 or $0.12 for each unredeemed share of Public Stock, under a non-interest-bearing unsecured promissory note. If no combination closes by July 25, 2023, the Board may extend up to five further times by one month each, a total of up to eight additional months, with further deposits aggregating up to $400,000. Why it matters: Twelve cents per share for the first three months is one of the more generous extension deposits in this cohort and does accrete to holders who stay. Against that, eight months of extension authority is granted in a single vote, so after this meeting the board can keep extending without returning to shareholders and without another redemption window. Accretion ultimately liquidated, so the redemption right exercised at this meeting was where the value was realized.
- What changed vs 2022-08-10trust $209.4M → $210.3M +0%
trust account, going-concern doubt, mandate language +11 moved · 3 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $209.4M$210.3M
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Mandate language
- the Company intends to concentrate its efforts to focus iden… · unchanged
- Redeemable shares
- 18.0M · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $920,000 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“30, 2022, the Company had $ 0.26 million in its operating bank account, and $ 210.31 million of cash held in the Trust Account to be used for a Business Combination or to repurchase or redeem its common stock in connection therewith”…
The clause …“to it on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the”…
The clause …“having been restated to reflect the share dividend in October 2021 (excluding 18,000,000 shares of common stock subject to possible redemption). Of the 5,295,000 shares of common stock outstanding, an aggregate of up to 675,000 shares”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2022-05-16trust $209.1M → $209.4M +0%
trust account, going-concern doubt, mandate language +11 moved · 3 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $209.1M$209.4M
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Mandate language
- the Company intends to concentrate its efforts to focus iden… · unchanged
- Redeemable shares
- 18.0M · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $299,889 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“30, 2022, the Company had $ 0.32 million in its operating bank account, and $ 209.39 million of cash held in the Trust Account to be used for a Business Combination or to repurchase or redeem its common stock in connection therewith”…
The clause …“to it on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the”…
The clause …“having been restated to reflect the share dividend in October 2021 (excluding 18,000,000 shares of common stock subject to possible redemption). Of the 5,295,000 shares of common stock outstanding, an aggregate of up to 675,000 shares”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2021-12-06going concern APPEARED
going-concern doubt, trust account, redeemable shares +11 moved · 3 with no prior record of ours
- Going-concern doubt
- not statedstated
- Trust account
- not previously extracted$209.1M
- Redeemable shares
- not previously extracted18.0M
- Mandate language
- the Company intends to concentrate its efforts to focus iden… · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as the substantial-doubt sentence is in this filing and not in the previous one.
The clause …“to it on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the”…
The clause …“current 302,399 315,012 Total Current Assets 709,248 976,788 Cash held in Trust Account 209,090,111 209,072,882 Prepaid expenses - non current 167,443 241,314 Total Assets $ 209,966,802 $ 210,290,984 ”…
The clause …“having been restated to reflect the share dividend in October 2021 (excluding 18,000,000 shares of common stock subject to possible redemption). Of the 5,295,000 shares of common stock outstanding, an aggregate of up to 675,000 shares”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
In plain English
Redemption deadlinethe last day to hand shares back for cash
Set by the filing that calls the meeting. Tender after it and the company is under no obligation to pay you the trust value.
Cash in trust / trust per sharethe cash the company is holding for each public share
Filed quarterly in the 10-Q's XBRL. It earns interest between filings, so the figure on a given day is slightly higher than the last filed one — where we show that we label it an estimate.
Accession numberthe SEC's unique id for one filing
Every figure on this page carries the accession of the filing that states it, so you can open the primary document rather than trust us.