CNTQ SEC filings, in plain English
Everything Chardan NexTech Acquisition 2 Corp. has filed with the SEC that we hold — 40 filings, newest first, 5 with a plain-English summary of what changed and why it matters. Every row links to the primary document on EDGAR, so you can check the source rather than trust us.
The feed
live EDGAR captureNew filings appear here within minutes of hitting EDGAR; summaries follow once the pipeline has read them.
What changed: Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. reported on August 20, 2026, that Nasdaq notified it of non-compliance with Listing Rule 5550(b)(1) due to a stockholders' equity deficit of $(184,000) and failure to meet alternative standards for market value or net income. The company has until October 5, 2026, to submit a plan to regain compliance, with a potential extension available until February 16, 2027. Why it matters: Investors should monitor the October 5 deadline for the compliance plan submission and the subsequent risk of delisting if Nasdaq rejects the plan or if the company fails to restore equity above $2.5 million by February 16, 2027.
What changed: Q2 2026 10-Q of Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (Nasdaq: DFLI), filed under Chardan NexTech Acquisition 2 Corp's CIK. Net sales were $13,159 thousand for the quarter versus $16,248 thousand a year earlier and $22,863 thousand for the six months versus $29,604 thousand. Gross profit was $4,343 thousand versus $4,605 thousand; loss from operations $(2,899) thousand versus $(3,281) thousand; interest expense fell to $1,536 thousand from $5,442 thousand; net loss was $(4,386) thousand versus $(7,034) thousand, and $(11,011) thousand for the six months. Why it matters: Sales fell 19% year over year while interest expense fell by $3.9 million, so the smaller net loss comes from the capital structure rather than from operations. Equity crossed into deficit during the half-year and cash is down about two thirds.
going-concern doubt, sponsor loans outstanding, mandate languagenothing moved · 3 with no prior record of ours
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Sponsor loans outstanding
- $450K · unchanged
- Mandate language
- we are focusing our selling efforts of “Battle Born” branded… · unchanged
The clause …“initiatives were executed in 2025 and early 2026 in order to alleviate the substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. These initiatives include multiple capital raises totaling a net cash increase of”…
The clause …“(ii) the Term Loan Lenders forgave the repayment of $5.0 million of the outstanding principal under the Term Loan Agreement, (iii) we paid a fee to the Term Loan Lenders equal to approximately $450,000 in cash and $450,000 added”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
What changed: Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (Nasdaq: DFLI) furnished a press release reporting preliminary second quarter 2026 results, expressly subject to finalization in the Form 10-Q. Net sales were $13,159 thousand against $16,248 thousand, down 19.0%, with OEM sales at $8,432 thousand (down 16.1%) and direct-to-consumer at $4,477 thousand (down 24.7%). Gross profit was $4.3 million at a 33.0% margin against 28.3%, including a $1.1 million tariff refund benefit recognised in cost of sales. Why it matters: The covenant package was loosened on three fronts at once — minimum cash, interest paid in kind, and two ratio tests pushed to September 2027 — which is what a lender does when the borrower could not meet them as written; it buys about $1 million of liquidity. Guidance implies adjusted EBITDA worsening again in the third quarter, against a stated target of profitability only at roughly $70 million of annualised sales versus about $53 million now.
What changed: 8-K of Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. Item 1.01 (entry into a material definitive agreement): on July 31, 2026 its subsidiary acquired substantially all operating assets of the Dakota Lithium brand, on an as-is where-is basis, from Clean Liquidation, LLC (assignment for the benefit of creditors), for an aggregate $4.0 million consisting of $1 million cash and 1,500,000 common shares issued at $2.00 per share for $3.0 million. The shares went to Recipients in exchange for releasing secured claims against the assets, and are locked up for 12 months. Why it matters: The same report discloses a Seventh Amendment to the senior secured Term Loan under which lenders consented to the transaction and the interest rate rises from 12.0% to 14.0% per annum, all payable in kind, through a PIK Period ending December 31, 2026; senior leverage and fixed charge coverage covenant testing is pushed from March 31, 2027 to September 30, 2027; and minimum liquidity is set at $4,000,000 from August 31, 2026 through January 31, 2027 and $5,000,000 thereafter.
What changed: Item 5.02: on June 18, 2026, on the recommendation of its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the board of Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. appointed Lukas Lutz as an independent director effective that day and as a member of that committee, replacing Brian Nelson. He was appointed a Class B director with a term expiring at the 2027 annual meeting. In connection with the appointment he was granted 10,000 restricted stock units, half vesting on the grant date and half on the first anniversary. Why it matters: A like-for-like independent director swap that preserves committee composition, which is what a listed company must maintain for continued compliance. The compensation detail is small and fully disclosed: 10,000 restricted stock units with half vesting immediately, which is quicker than the usual one-year cliff for new directors and slightly reduces the retention value of the grant. Nothing here changes results, guidance or capital structure.
mandate language, going-concern doubt, sponsor loans outstandingnothing moved · 3 with no prior record of ours
- Mandate language
- not previously extractedwe are focusing our selling efforts of “Battle Born” branded…
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Sponsor loans outstanding
- $450K · unchanged
The clause …“initiatives were executed in 2025 and early 2026 in order to alleviate the substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. These initiatives include multiple capital raises totaling a net cash increase of”…
The clause …“(ii) the Term Loan Lenders forgave the repayment of $5.0 million of the outstanding principal under the Term Loan Agreement, (iii) we paid a fee to the Term Loan Lenders equal to approximately $450,000 in cash and $450,000 added”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
sponsor loans outstanding, going-concern doubtnothing moved · 2 with no prior record of ours
- Sponsor loans outstanding
- not previously extracted$450K
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
The clause …“”), (ii) the Term Loan Lenders forgave the repayment of $5.0 million of the outstanding principal under the Term Loan Agreement, (iii) we paid a fee to the Term Loan Lenders equal to approximately $450,000 in cash and $450,000 added”…
The clause …“Position and Capital Requirements related our ability to continue as a going concern ● We, as well as our independent registered public accounting firm, have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2025-08-14going concern APPEARED
going-concern doubt, sponsor loans outstanding1 moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Going-concern doubt
- not statedstated
- Sponsor loans outstanding
- not previously extracted$450K
SpacBrain reads this as the substantial-doubt sentence is in this filing and not in the previous one.
The clause …“above, strategic initiatives were executed in 2025 in order to alleviate the substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These initiatives include multiple capital raises (including those subsequent to”…
The clause …“(ii) the Term Loan Lenders forgave the repayment of $5.0 million of the outstanding principal under the Term Loan Agreement, (iii) we paid a fee to the Term Loan Lenders equal to approximately $450,000 in cash and $450,000 added”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
In plain English
Redemption deadlinethe last day to hand shares back for cash
Set by the filing that calls the meeting. Tender after it and the company is under no obligation to pay you the trust value.
Cash in trust / trust per sharethe cash the company is holding for each public share
Filed quarterly in the 10-Q's XBRL. It earns interest between filings, so the figure on a given day is slightly higher than the last filed one — where we show that we label it an estimate.
Accession numberthe SEC's unique id for one filing
Every figure on this page carries the accession of the filing that states it, so you can open the primary document rather than trust us.