CCVI SEC filings, in plain English
Everything Churchill Capital Corp VI has filed with the SEC that we hold — 40 filings, newest first, 1 with a plain-English summary of what changed and why it matters. Every row links to the primary document on EDGAR, so you can check the source rather than trust us.
The feed
live EDGAR captureNew filings appear here within minutes of hitting EDGAR; summaries follow once the pipeline has read them.
- What changed vs 2023-08-11trust $283.4M → $286.9M +1%
trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt +11 moved · 3 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $283.4M$286.9M
- Combination deadline
- 2024-02-17 · unchanged
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Sponsor loans outstanding
- $500K · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $3,524,347 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause “99,409 Total current assets 1,697,234 1,513,294 Cash and marketable securities held in Trust Account 286,880,881 558,882,227 TOTAL ASSETS $ 288,578,115 $ 560,395,521 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT Current liabilities Accrued”…
The clause …“as determined by the board of directors. The Company intends to complete a Business Combination by February 17, 2024. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements We have no obligations, assets or liabilities, which would be considered off-balance”…
The clause …“to it on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern through one year from the date of these unaudited condensed financial statements”…
The clause …“in the condensed financial statements. On October 17, 2023, the Company borrowed $ 500,000 in connection with the Extension Promissory Note entered into on May 16, 2023 and deposited $ 500,000 into the Trust Account in connection”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2023-05-15trust $564.0M → $283.4M -50%
trust account, sponsor loans outstanding, combination deadline +11 moved · 3 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $564.0M$283.4M
- Sponsor loans outstanding
- not previously extracted$500K
- Combination deadline
- 2024-02-17 · unchanged
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $280,617,481 left the trust between the two filings.
The clause “99,409 Total current assets 1,997,346 1,513,294 Cash and marketable securities held in Trust Account 283,356,534 558,882,227 TOTAL ASSETS $ 285,353,880 $ 560,395,521 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT Current liabilities Accrued”…
The clause …“in the condensed financial statements. On July 17, 2023, the Company borrowed $ 500,000 in connection with the Extension Promissory Note entered into on May 16, 2023 and deposited $ 500,000,000 into the Trust Account in”…
The clause …“as determined by the board of directors. The Company intends to complete a Business Combination by February 17, 2024. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements We have no obligations, assets or liabilities, which would be considered off-balance”…
The clause …“to it on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern through one year from the date of these unaudited condensed financial statements”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2022-11-14trust $555.0M → $564.0M +2%deadline 2023-02-17 → 2024-02-17
trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt2 moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $555.0M$564.0M
- Combination deadline
- 2023-02-172024-02-17
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $8,948,745 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause “99,409 Total current assets 1,179,555 1,513,294 Cash and marketable securities held in Trust Account 563,974,015 558,882,227 TOTAL ASSETS $ 565,153,570 $ 560,395,521 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT Current liabilities Accrued”…
SpacBrain reads this as 365 days later than the previous record.
The clause …“to consummate a business combination (the “Extension”) from May 17, 2023 to February 17, 2024 (or such earlier date as determined by the Company’s board of directors) (the “Charter Amendment”). The Extension will not b e effective”…
The clause …“that the potential mandatory liquidation and subsequent dissolution raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. No adjustments have been made to the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
What changed: Churchill Capital Corp VI set a virtual special meeting for May 11, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern to extend the termination date beyond May 17, 2023. On the record date the redemption price per share was about $10.16, based on about $564.7 million on deposit in the trust account including interest not earlier released but net of taxes payable, against a New York Stock Exchange closing price of $10.10 for the Class A common stock. Why it matters: With about $564.7 million intact the trust has taken no material redemptions, and the $10.16 per-share floor sits six cents above the $10.10 market price, making redemption the better exit for anyone who wants out. The principal-protection language is the structural strength here: working capital can only be funded from interest, so the deposited $10.00 per share cannot be spent down by the sponsor's operating costs. Holders who stay keep the same redemption right at the extended date, so the practical question is only how long they are willing to wait.
- What changed vs 2022-03-31trust $552.1M → $558.9M +1%
trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt +11 moved · 3 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $552.1M$558.9M
- Combination deadline
- 2023-05-17 · unchanged
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Sponsor loans outstanding
- $175K · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $6,743,870 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“other costs. As of December 31, 2022, we had cash and marketable securities held in the trust account of $558,882,227 (including $8,139,227 of interest income partially offset by permitted withdrawals of $1,257,000) consisting of U.S.”…
The clause …“realization of its business plan is dependent upon its ability to complete a business combination on or before May 17, 2023, which is less than one year from the issuance date of the financial statements. If a business combination is”…
The clause …“that the potential mandatory liquidation and subsequent dissolution raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. No adjustments have been made to the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities”…
The clause …“and due on the earlier of December 31, 2021 or the closing of the IPO. We borrowed $175,000 under this promissory note and repaid the full outstanding balance of the promissory note on February 17, 2021. We entered into an”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2022-08-15trust $552.9M → $555.0M +0%
trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt1 moved · 2 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $552.9M$555.0M
- Combination deadline
- 2023-02-17 · unchanged
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $2,094,132 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause “269,772 685,861 Total current assets 1,245,184 1,737,161 Marketable securities held in Trust Account 555,025,270 552,138,357 TOTAL ASSETS $ 556,270,454 $ 553,875,518 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT Current liabilities Accrued”…
The clause …“letter of intent, agreement in principle or definitive agreement for a Business Combination by February 17, 2023). The Company intends to complete a Business Combination before the mandatory liquidation date. Off-Balance Sheet”…
The clause …“that the potential mandatory liquidation and subsequent dissolution raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. No adjustments have been made to the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2022-05-16trust $552.3M → $552.9M +0%deadline 2023-05-17 → 2023-02-17
trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt2 moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $552.3M$552.9M
- Combination deadline
- 2023-05-172023-02-17
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $637,251 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“440,135 685,861 Total current assets 972,717 1,737,161 Marketable securities held in Trust Account 552,931,138 552,138,357 TOTAL ASSETS $ 553,903,855 $ 553,875,518 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT Current liabilities Accrued”…
SpacBrain reads this as 89 days earlier than the previous record.
The clause …“letter of intent, agreement in principle or definitive agreement for a Business Combination by February 17, 2023). The Company intends to complete a Business Combination before the mandatory liquidation date. Off-Balance Sheet”…
The clause …“that the potential mandatory liquidation and subsequent dissolution raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. No adjustments have been made to the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2021-11-17trust $552.0M → $552.3M +0%going concern APPEARED
trust account, going-concern doubt, combination deadline2 moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $552.0M$552.3M
- Going-concern doubt
- not statedstated
- Combination deadline
- not previously extracted2023-05-17
SpacBrain reads this as $258,077 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause “610,498 685,861 Total current assets 1,430,499 1,737,161 Marketable securities held in Trust Account 552,293,887 552,138,357 TOTAL ASSETS $ 553,724,386 $ 553,875,518 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT Current liabilities Accrued”…
SpacBrain reads this as the substantial-doubt sentence is in this filing and not in the previous one.
The clause …“all operations except for the purpose of liquidating. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Based on substantial progress with potential Business Combination targets,”…
The clause …“that would allow the Company to extend the mandatory liquidation date to May 17, 2023. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might become necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
In plain English
Redemption deadlinethe last day to hand shares back for cash
Set by the filing that calls the meeting. Tender after it and the company is under no obligation to pay you the trust value.
Cash in trust / trust per sharethe cash the company is holding for each public share
Filed quarterly in the 10-Q's XBRL. It earns interest between filings, so the figure on a given day is slightly higher than the last filed one — where we show that we label it an estimate.
Accession numberthe SEC's unique id for one filing
Every figure on this page carries the accession of the filing that states it, so you can open the primary document rather than trust us.