BRIV SEC filings, in plain English
Everything B. Riley Principal 250 Merger Corp. has filed with the SEC that we hold — 40 filings, newest first. Every row links to the primary document on EDGAR, so you can check the source rather than trust us.
The feed
live EDGAR captureNew filings appear here within minutes of hitting EDGAR; summaries follow once the pipeline has read them.
- What changed vs 2022-03-29trust $172.5M → $174.4M +1%going concern APPEARED
trust account, going-concern doubt, combination deadline +12 moved · 2 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $172.5M$174.4M
- Going-concern doubt
- not statedstated
- Combination deadline
- 2023-05-11 · unchanged
- Redeemable shares
- 17.3M · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $1,929,711 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“1,164,265 1,480,205 Prepaid expenses - non-current — 150,290 Investments held in Trust Account 174,437,246 172,507,535 Total assets $ 175,601,511 $ 174,138,030 Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Current liabilities: Accounts”…
SpacBrain reads this as the substantial-doubt sentence is in this filing and not in the previous one.
The clause …“Business Combination, we will never generate any operating revenues. There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue to operate as a “going concern.” On December 31, 2022, we had $442,978 in our operating bank account,”…
The clause …“and Private Placement Shares held by them if we fail to consummate an Initial Business Combination by May 11, 2023. If we do not an Initial Business Combination within such applicable time period, the proceeds of the sale of the Private”…
The clause …“occurrence of uncertain future events. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2022, 17,250,000 shares of Class A common stock subject to possible redemption at the redemption amount were presented at redemption value as temporary equity,”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2022-08-11trust $172.8M → $173.2M +0%
trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt +11 moved · 3 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $172.8M$173.2M
- Combination deadline
- 2023-05-11 · unchanged
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Redeemable shares
- 17.3M · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $463,758 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“assets 790,318 1,480,205 Prepaid expenses - non-current — 150,290 Investments held in Trust Account 173,216,348 172,507,535 Total assets $ 174,006,666 $ 174,138,030 Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) Current liabilities:”…
The clause …“December 31, 2022, including any redemptions in connection with an Initial Business Combination or in the event we do not consummate an Business Combination by May 11, 2023. Whether and to what extent we would be subject to the”…
The clause …“to it on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the issuance date of these condensed financial statements.”…
The clause …“future events. Accordingly, as of September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, 17,250,000 shares of Class A common stock subject to possible redemption at the redemption amount were presented at redemption value as temporary equity,”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2022-05-13trust $172.5M → $172.8M +0%
trust account, combination deadline, going-concern doubt +11 moved · 3 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $172.5M$172.8M
- Combination deadline
- 2023-05-11 · unchanged
- Going-concern doubt
- stated · unchanged
- Redeemable shares
- 17.3M · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $228,654 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“1,036,402 1,480,205 Prepaid expenses - non-current — 150,290 Investments held in Trust Account 172,752,590 172,507,535 Total assets $ 173,788,992 $ 174,138,030 Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit Current liabilities: Accounts”…
The clause …“to continue as a going concern. Management intends to complete an Initial Business Combination on or before May 11, 2023. However, it is uncertain whether management will succeed in doing so. The financial statements contained”…
The clause …“to it on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the issuance date of these condensed financial statements.”…
The clause …“future events. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, 17,250,000 shares of Class A common stock subject to possible redemption at the redemption amount were presented at redemption value as temporary equity,”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2021-11-22trust $172.5M → $172.5M +0%going concern APPEARED
trust account, going-concern doubt, combination deadline +12 moved · 2 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $172.5M$172.5M
- Going-concern doubt
- not statedstated
- Combination deadline
- not previously extracted2023-05-11
- Redeemable shares
- 17.3M · unchanged
SpacBrain reads this as $20,046 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause …“1,224,165 1,480,205 Prepaid expenses - non-current 42,774 150,290 Investments held in Trust Account 172,523,936 172,507,535 Total assets $ 173,790,875 $ 174,138,030 Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit Current liabilities: Accounts”…
SpacBrain reads this as the substantial-doubt sentence is in this filing and not in the previous one.
The clause …“to it on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the issuance date of these condensed financial statements.”…
The clause …“to continue as a going concern. Management intends to complete an Initial Business Combination on or before May 11, 2023. However, it is uncertain whether management will succeed in doing so. The financial statements contained”…
The clause …“future events. Accordingly, as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, 17,250,000 shares of Class A common stock subject to possible redemption at the redemption amount were presented at redemption value as temporary equity,”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2021-08-09trust $172.5M → $172.5M +0%
trust account, redeemable shares1 moved · 1 with no prior record of ours
- Trust account
- $172.5M$172.5M
- Redeemable shares
- not previously extracted17.3M
SpacBrain reads this as $2,219 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause “$ 25,000 Prepaid expenses 690,080 — Total current assets 1,830,344 25,000 Cash held in Trust Account 172,503,890 — Total assets $ 174,334,234 $ 25,000 Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued”…
The clause …“occurrence of uncertain future events. Accordingly, as of September 30, 2021, 17,250,000 shares of Class A common stock subject to possible redemption at the redemption amount were presented at redemption value as temporary equity,”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
- What changed vs 2021-06-25trust $172.5M → $172.5M +0%
trust account1 moved
- Trust account
- $172.5M$172.5M
SpacBrain reads this as $1,671 was added to the trust between the two filings.
The clause “$ 25,000 Prepaid expenses 805,252 — Total current assets 1,950,676 25,000 Cash held in Trust Account 172,501,671 — Total assets $ 174,452,347 $ 25,000 Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued”…
Read from stored SEC filing text by a regex — no model is involved — and each side links to the filing it came from. “Not previously extracted” is a statement about our record, not about the company: the clause may be present in wording we do not match.
In plain English
Redemption deadlinethe last day to hand shares back for cash
Set by the filing that calls the meeting. Tender after it and the company is under no obligation to pay you the trust value.
Cash in trust / trust per sharethe cash the company is holding for each public share
Filed quarterly in the 10-Q's XBRL. It earns interest between filings, so the figure on a given day is slightly higher than the last filed one — where we show that we label it an estimate.
Accession numberthe SEC's unique id for one filing
Every figure on this page carries the accession of the filing that states it, so you can open the primary document rather than trust us.