Loading
Distinct shells carrying a filed role for this person — not every shell they have ever touched.
Of those vehicles, the ones that closed a merger.
Announced but not closed, and still hunting.
No closed vehicle here has both a stored price and a filed trust value to score it against.
1 liquidated — weigh against the wins.
1 vehicle on file, newest listing first
Lou Kerner joined as an advisor before becoming a partner in the Blockchain Coinvestors syndicate on AngelList and the sponsor. Mr. Le Merle, Mr. Kerner and Ms. Davis have known each other since the mid-1980s and share deep experience in the internet, financial technology, blockchain and digital currency sectors, as well as in forming, leading, directing and advising companies. The financial investors in many of the recent blockchain unicorns are the leading pure-play blockchain venture capital (“VC”) firms and a handful of general purpose VC funds. Investors wishing to invest capital in these early stage companies often do not have direct access to VCs. Blockchain Coinvestors maintains 3 Table of Contents relationships with the leadership of many of these firms as a result of its stewardship of two of the world’s earliest blockchain venture fund of funds, with its third fund of funds currently being formed.
This record is keyed to SEC CIK 0001382965 — the identifier this person files under in their own name. Every vehicle above is a filing made under that CIK, so “the same person on two shells” is a fact about an SEC identifier rather than about a name that happens to match.
Roles are the strings the filings used, in the order they were filed. Nothing on this page ranks them, infers seniority, or offers a reason why any two of these names recur — a recurrence is a count, and the filings that produced it are linked beside every row. We also hold 37 institutional-holder rows on these vehicles, under 19 distinct name strings, and none of them is counted across vehicles: that table has no CIK column, and matching holders by name would merge firms that are not the same firm.